I am working on a project which requires three different voltage levels – Motor that can run at 7-12 V. Hall sensor that can run at 5-25 V. nRF24L01+ that can run at 2-3.6 V and AVR (arduino) which can run at 2-5 V.
Since battery life is a major concern, I think voltage regulators (specially the linear ones) will be a bad idea. For motor, I am planning to use a LiPo battery – 11.1 V rated. It'd be great if remaining circuit can be run on 3V. This way I can use AA cells for them. The only blocker is Hall sensor. I saw one which can run at 2.5-25 V but most of them run at 4.8-25V so I am not sure whether I'd be able to get low power version in local market.
As such, I am left with two choices:
- Use AA cells to get 3V which will take care of Arduino and nRF.
Use boost converter to power Hall sensors. - Use 2xAA cells to power up Arduino and nRF and another 2xAA cells
added in series with the previous ones to get 6 V and use it for Hall
sensor.
Which one would be a better idea?
Also, it'd be great if you can suggest me some non-latching type Hall sensors in 3 pin sil package, if possible with working voltage range starting from 1.5 or 2 volts.
Best Answer
In the end, the most simple solution is usually the best. Let's try to sort your needs out.
1) You need a beefy power supply for a motor, 12V-ish. Fine, you have this sorted out already.
2) You need to power the Hall sensor. Why not power it directly from 12V, if it's 5-25V rated? There can be 2 minor difficulties there :
Connecting Hall sensor output to mcu input. If the output is open collector, that's obviously fine as-is. Otherwise, depending on the operation frequency and the mcu input's impedance requirements, the 12v logic out -> 3.3V mcu in connection could be as simple as a large enough resistor, input is then clamped by mcu input diodes.
Current draw from hall sensor at 12V. That's up to you to determine if it is acceptable. If you need to power it off when dot doing measurements, that's a bit more involved but can be done easily.
3) MCU power can be done simply with a 3.3V buck regulator. Google "low quiescent current buck regulator" returns LT3991 as the second hit, Iq=2.1µA for 12V->3.3V. Then it's just a matter of putting the mcu and peripherials to sleep most of the time, which you'll need to do anyway.
In the end, I think there is NO WAY a second battery with holder can be more efficient for a given battery life, be it weight-wise, volume-wise, and even price-wise, than a simple switching regulator and slightly larger main battery. The only exception I can possibly see is if you need galvanic isolation and low RFI - totally off topic here.