Electronic – Decoupling Capacitors on each VDD pin on a tiny 36/49 ball WLCSP/µBGA chip really necessary

capacitordecouplingdecoupling-capacitorlayoutmicrocontroller

I've searched this and many other sources on Info on decoupling capacitor placement, but couldn't find any info specific enough to my current problem.

I'm currently doing a PCB Layout for a tiny, ultra-fine-pitch WLCSP microcontroller. It's 3x3mm and has 49 Balls (7×7) at 0.4mm pitch, and I'm looking at another with 36 balls (2.1×1.9mm with 0.35mm pitch).
There are a couple VDD and VSS pin pairs, and unfortunately not all on the outer balls. I've tried placing all the recommended decoupling caps as close as possible to the pin-pairs, and connecting them with the shortest traces possible, as everyone recommends. However, I'm running into routing problems, and have realized that trying to keep one Capacitor on each pair of supply pins actually leads to much longer traces than if I'd just connect some of the pins to each other, so some of the supply pins would share a single capacitor.

I get that each pair of supply pins ideally should have its own capacitor. I'm not 100% sure of all the reasons why, but my understanding is it's mainly for guaranteeing shortest traces-> lowest impendance, and therefore best (local) "stabilization" of the supply voltage. And of course for seperating Analog from Digital, but since my circuit is digital only, that's not MY worry at the moment.

Now I'm wondering if this still holds true for such tiny devices, where I could, for example place a single capacitor on the bottom side, right under my component, and have all my Vdd and GND traces reach it with a single via and less than 1mm trace.
1) Why would I want to put 2 or three there?
2) Would it be better or worse if there is absolutely no space there for say the third cap anymore, and my next best option would be to place the third Capacitor next to the chip on the top layer, but require two vias and 3mm trace length to reach it, compared to a single via and 1mm trace the first or second Capacitor already under the PCB?

The supplying LDO with a bigger Capacitor (2.2 or 4.7uF will be maybe 5mm further away…)

Thanks for any helpful Info.

Best Answer

You do not need to place the decoupling capacitors as close as possible (or even directly) to the power pins. Instead, be sure to use a VDD and VSS plane. Connect the microcontroller power pins as direct as possible to these planes using vias. Then, place the decoupling capacitors to a place nearby where it suits you best. Connect these decoupling capacitors directly to the planes using vias, again.

Why does this work? At the frequencies the controller is working, the power supply impedance should be low. Capacitors are low impedance in the range of approx. 100 kHz to 20 MHz. (Btw, at about some tens of MHz, the plane capacitance is slowly taking over.) But this only works if the caps are connected via a low inductance path. The idea behind placing the decoupling capacitors next to the power pins is to reduce the inductance between them and the power pins. Now, the plane has almost no inductance. Capacitor placement has almost no impact if you are using planes. We have successfully been using well defined "capacitor isles", instead of capacitor scattering, on relatively large PCBs.

Another tip: Try to place the VDD and VSS vias of the capacitor close to each other, as this reduces the inductance from capacitor to plane.