To be honest the line between the two is almost gone nowadays and there are processors that can be classified as both (AD Blackfin for instance).
Generally speaking:
Microcontrollers are integer math processors with an interrupt sub system. Some may have hardware multiplication units, some don't, etc. Point is they are designed for simple math, and mostly to control other devices.
DSPs are processors optimized for streaming signal processing. They often have special instructions that speed common tasks such as multiply-accumulate in a single instruction. They also often have other vector or SIMD instructions. Historically they weren't interrupt based systems and operated with non-standard memory systems optimized for their purpose making them more difficult to program. They were usually designed to operate in one big loop processing a data stream. DSP's can be designed as integer, fixed point or floating point processors.
Historically if you wanted to process audio streams, video streams, do fast motor control, anything that required processing a stream of data at high speed you would look to a DSP.
If you wanted to control some buttons, measure a temperature, run a character LCD, control other ICs which are processing things, you'd use a microcontroller.
Today, you mostly find general purpose microcontroller type processors with either built in DSP-like instructions or with on chip co-processors to deal with streaming data or other DSP operations. You don't see pure DSP's used much anymore except in specific industries.
The processor market is much broader and more blurry than it used to be. For instance i hardly consider a ARM cortex-A8 SoC a micro-controller but it probably fits the standard definition, especially in a PoP package.
EDIT: Figured i'd add a bit to explain when/where i've used DSPs even in the days of application processors.
A recent product i designed was doing audio processing with X channels of input and X channels of output per 'zone'. The intended use for the product meant that it would often times sit there doing its thing, processing the audio channels for years without anyone touching it. The audio processing consisted of various acoustical filters and functions. The system also was "hot plugable" with the ability to add some number of independent 'zones' all in one box. It was a total of 3 PCB designs (mainboard, a backplane and a plug in module) and the backplane supported 4 plug in modules. Quite a fun project as i was doing it solo, i got to do the system design, schematic, PCB layout and firmware.
Now i could have done the entire thing with an single bulky ARM core, i only needed about 50MIPS of DSP work on 24bit fixed point numbers per zone. But because i knew this system would operate for an extremely long time and knew it was critical that it never click or pop or anything like that. I chose to implement it with a low power DSP per zone and a single PIC microcontroller that played the system management role. This way even if one of the uC functions crashed, maybe a DDOS attack on its Ethernet port, the DSP would happily just keep chugging away and its likely no one would ever know.
So the microcontroller played the role of running the 2 line character LCD, some buttons, temperature monitoring and fan control (there were also some fairly high power audio amplifiers on each board) and even served an AJAX style web page via ethernet. It also managed the DSPs via a serial connection.
So thats a situation where even in the days where i could have used a single ARM core to do everything, the design dictated a dedicated signal processing IC.
Other areas where i've run into DSPs:
*High End audio - Very high end receivers and concert quality mixing and processing gear
*Radar Processing - I've also used ARM cores for this in low end apps.
*Sonar Processing
*Real time computer vision
For the most part, the low and mid ends of the audio/video/similar space have been taken over by application processors which combine a general purpose CPU with co-proc offload engines for various applications.
Where on earth will this be used?
A 100 mA x 5V PV (= photovoltaic = solar) cell is not a small item compared to many items of portable equipment.
A modern highish efficiency crystalline PV panel will give you about 10 mW/cm^2 actually delivered in full sun.
So for 5V x 100 mA = 500 mW output you will need about 50 cm^2.
You can connect this via a diode directly across a suitable battery, or via a regulator to a load of your choice. If you connect directly to a battery then you may wish to provide overvoltage regulation. This is easy and cheap and can be discussed if your application sounds like that approach may be useful.
A 9V Alkaline "PP3"size (transistor radio type) battery is NOT intended to be recharged. You could arrange the panel so that it sup[plies load current when it is able to do so, but does not do so, or you could arrange it so it can power the equipment directly when illuminated adequately and the load is active BUT can also charge the battery. Alkaline batteries are NOT intended by their manufacturers to be recharged in most cases BUT a degree of recharging is in fact possible. Charging efficiency is limited, lifetime cycles are poor compared to eg NimH, and overcharge control would be needed. This is a nonstandard application so you would need to be aware of possible problems.
Use of a small rechargeable battery in combination with the main battery could be useful. Charge control is easy and cheap.
Best Answer
Measure the no-load voltage with a meter and then measure it with full load. If the two voltages are both about 5V +/- 0.5 volts you may get away without a regulator (and that's if you need a 5V supply to your PIC). You might also need to add extra decoupling capacitors to avoid too much ripple or switching noise from the internal regulator it may use.