This question originates from a diode question in which we modelled diodes using the simple piece-wise linear model. According to the lecture notes, the diode acts as a battery after attaining Vf(forward bias voltage). This creates a seemingly paradoxical relation.
becomes
In the battery-equivalent circuit above, quick circuit analysis shows that if unknown= unknown1 = 6V, there should be 4A flowing upwards from the 5V source. However this is impossible in the diode circuit since no current can flow through the diode from – to +(In the model that we are using at least).
So this creates a very confusing situation, is there actually current flowing through the diode or not? If so, how can this be explained?
EDIT: So I understand that I made a wrong assumption which led to the inconsistency. However, a new question arises, if I had unknown = 10V, that reaches the minimum requirement to activate the diode, but KCL shows that no current flows through the diode. I'd like to know why this is? More specifically in terms of intuition, what makes the resistor path more prefered for the current to travel through?
Best Answer
"According to the lecture notes, the diode acts as a battery after attaining Vf(forward bias voltage)." The model should have gone on to say if it does not get to forward bias it acts as an open circuit (reverse biased) so your 4.4V source is not connected. If the diode is reverse biased.
You can determine if it is in reverse bias by looking at the current through the diode if current could flow from cathode to anode it is reverse biased.
In your case this occurs if the voltage created by the R1,R2 divider is less than 5V in this case you have an open circuit instead of a diode. If the undefined voltage source is high enough to drive the diode into forward bias you have the case in your second diagram.