Electronic – Frequency response of dual vs single op amp: OPA2890 vs OPA890

frequency responseoperational-amplifiertexas instruments

I am looking for an op amp to use as a unity gain buffer with a disable feature. The OPAx890 looks like a good candidate because it is unity gain stable.

I have noticed that some op amps labeled as unity gain stable have worse stability than others (e.g. OPA690 claims unity gain stability, but its stability is poor. The G=+1 small-signal frequency response shows >3dB of peaking in the datasheet).

The OPA2890 has a very nice looking small-signal frequency response in a unity gain configuration:
enter image description here

I do not need a dual op amp. I was glad to find that there is also the OPA890 which looks like a single version of the OPA2890. It looks like the OPA890 has worse stability with some peaking at G=+1:

enter image description here

Does this make any sense? I would think the same op amp would have the same frequency response, or for the single to have better properties than the dual. Of course I can just get the dual and use 1, but is this an actual difference between op amps or just an error in the datasheet?

Best Answer

It looks like there is an actual difference between the OPA890 and the OPA2890. For example, the parametric table on the OPA890's description page shows that the OPA890 has a slightly higher GBW (260 MHz vs. 250 MHz), higher slew rate (500 V/µs vs. 400 V/µs), lower offset drift over temperature (15 µV/C vs. 35 µV/C), etc. The electrical tables in the two datasheets show more specific differences as well. The OPA890 is a bit faster than the OPA2890 so it looks like the two figures in the datasheets are correct.