# Electronic – Is a diode an effective way to replace a resistor in an application where heat should be avoided

Currently with my project where I removed some christmas lights from a string, I used a resistor in place of the removed bulbs successfully.

(Note: Skip down to "Diode as replacement?" section for the question. Below are the details for reference)

Here is what is going on currently:

R1 is a 150 ohm 10 watt resistor, and
R2 is a 220 ohm 10 watt resistor.

The whole string has these specs:

120 volts (outlet)
0.34 amps
40.8 watts

This means each bulb is:

2.4v
0.17 amps
14.11765 ohms
0.408 watts

Here is what is running through R1:

38.4 volts
0.17 amps
225.88 ohms
6.528 watts

And here is what is running through R2:

26.4 volts
0.17 amps
155.29412 ohms
4.488 watts

(note: calculations calculated via online calculator)

It works.

However, the downside of using a resistor is that it gets very hot, and according to the heat chart, in order for it to be cool enough even to not burn to the touch, it would need to be at 15% load.

See an earlier comment I made:

… about 44C is the threshold for pain in touching a hot surface, so
around 42C (108F) is safe to touch… according to the chart, the
safe-to-touch threshold is at only about 15% load!

You can see from the chart (thanks @Bort), the limitations of using a resistor in this case:

This chart is for the 220 ohm 10 watt resistor. (part number and datasheet)

In other words, I would need a very high wattage resistor in order for it to run cool, which isn't practical. Or, I would need to string together many resistors, which also is not practical.

I'm worried that something like a leaf could land on the resistor and catch fire. So as a result, I have unplugged the lights for now (still have a lot of time before christmas!).

Even though for example the R2 resistor is running in the safe zone for the resistor at 65% load, still that is 165°C which is actually a very very hot 329°F!

Over 300 Fahrenheit is very hot, and as such it is not practical nor safe to use a resistor for this project, even though it works and is running in the correct range and is used correctly.

Other options are build a heatsink, but for \$3 or even \$10 string of lights, that makes no sense. And attaching a large piece of metal (for heat dissipation) could work but would turn the christmas lights into an eyesore.

# Diode as replacement?

So I was thinking about if there could be an alternative to using a resistor, since it doesn't make sense to use a resistor in this case due to the reasons described above.

Someone suggested that I could use a rectifier diode in place of the resistor in order to step down the voltage.

This makes sense, by stepping down the voltage, it would subsequently reduce the wattage and hence possibly remove the need for a resistor as the whole string would have a lower wattage due to the formula for determining wattage from amps and volts.

So that means that to replace `R1` with `D1`, we would need to step down the voltage by `26.4v`, and to replace `R2` with `D2` we would need to step down the voltage by `38.4v`.

See this new schematic with diodes instead of resistors:

So if that is right, it would mean that for example on the D1 string, the remaining voltage going through the remaining would be 93.6v.

Assuming the diode does not affect amperage, then that means that going through the remaining 39 bulbs on that string are:

93.6 volts
0.17 amps
15.912 watts

15.912w / 39 bulbs = 0.408w through each bulb
This is the original wattage going through each bulb, which is perfect.

• Would this work? If not, what can you do instead?
• Would the diode not get hot?
• Are my calculations correct?
• Any other variables to consider?