I am powering a board and circuit with a 9V battery (those alkaline ones). And I would like to read the 9V battery to keep track of how much power it has left. I have read that I can do this with a voltage divider since most ADC input on uCs take 5V max. That's good but wouldn't the voltage divider itself draw power and make the battery drain faster? I am not going to constantly measure battery level.
Electronic – microcontroller low battery indicator
batteriesmicrocontrollerpower
Related Solutions
Just a random list, if you post your schematic it would probably be easier:
1.8V lithium Coin cells are very easy to find, but more likely your serial interface needs 3.3v? Unless your receiving end will deal with 1.8V.
Leakage current does generally go up as your voltage increases, so lower is better usually. Also consider the brown-out point for the system vs the battery characteristics. The 'death' characteristics of the battery will be determines by the battery chemistry you use. For instance if your uC browns out at 1.7V you may actually want to use a higher voltage battery as with some batteries the output voltage will lower slowly as the battery dies. You'd get more life out of a 3.3V battery as when it begins to die its output will slowly drop and you can operate all the way down to 1.8V. If you use a 1.8V battery your going to shut down fairly quickly as the battery dies. This all assumes your serial interface or other components can deal with a wide voltage range (I know the AVR can).
LED's use a lot of power, unless you use a very low power LED and are controlling its current draw it's probably drawing a lot more current than the AVR is. If its just there for debug, don't populate it for production or only have it blink once in a while or something to minimize its on time, and definitely control its current draw.
If you can, pick the polarity / rest state of your serial interface to draw as little power as possible, it's rest state should not be drawing power. If pull ups are required use the largest resistor possible to maintain signal integrity but minimize current usage. If power is a huge concern use a signally scheme that favor's bits that don't draw power. For instance if you have pull ups, using a protocol that results in lots of 1's in the signal will leave the serial interface in a state that isn't drawing as much power most of the time. Such optimizations are only worthwhile if your making heavy use of the serial bus. If its very lightly used just make sure its rest state isn't drawing power.
Generally speaking you can assume all instructions (reading GPIO, etc) require the same amount of power. Its not really true but the power difference is minimal.
Power usage is much more dependent on the number/type of peripherals you have powered on, and the amount of time the micro spends active vs sleeping. So the ADC uses more power, EEPROM writes use a fair amount of power. Specifically something like the EEPROM writes are usually done in fairly large 'chunks' so you should accumulate as much information as you can before doing the write to the EEPROM (if your even using it of course). For the ADC that micro supports doing the ADC read during 2 of its sleep states, as ADC conversion takes a relatively long time this is a good time to sleep.
You should probably just read the sections on power management, sleep states and minimizing power using in the microcontroller's data sheet: linky page 35 on. Keep the AVR in the deepest sleep state possible as long as possible. The only exception to this is that you have to consider the start up and shutdown time. Its not worth it to sleep for 10 cycles if waking back up takes 25, etc.
Do resistors use up battery life? Do capacitors? Do diodes?
They all do to some extent. Resistors dissipate the most in most applications:
P = V*I
P = V^2 / R or P = I^2 * R (where V is the voltage drop across the resistor)
Diode's have a (relatively) fixed voltage drop, so power dissipation is almost exclusively tied to current passing through the diode. For instance a diode with a 0.7V forward voltage drop, P = 0.7 * I if current is moving forward through the diode. This is a simplification of course and you should check out the operating mode based on the diode's I-V characteristics.
Capacitors theoretically shouldn't dissipate any power, but in reality they have a finite series resistance and non-zero leakage current which means they do dissipate some power, generally not something you should worry about with such low voltages though. That being said choosing capacitors with minimal leakage current and ESR is a power win.
As far as using them to smooth out battery draw, this doesn't really help for power usage, its more for filtering. Also battery chemistry comes into play here, some chemistries will be happier with a constant draw, some deal better with spiky current draws.
You could use a P channel MOSFET for connecting the battery to a lower resistance potential divider but it would need a spare GPIO line: -
The TPS1110 has a leakage current less than 100 nA so it won't draw too much from the battery.
Related Topic
- Electronic – arduino – Rough Battery (9V Alkaline) Level Estimation with Analogue Reading
- Electronic – Measuring Battery Voltage from Microcontroller using ADC
- Electronic – Measuring a low AC Voltage with microcontroller
- Electronic – arduino – Ultra low power arduino wireless sensor : care of battery discharge
- Electronic – How to calculate CR2032 battery life with LED
Best Answer
If you use a voltage divider with fairly high value resistors, e.g. two 499K in series and tap off the middle, your maximum voltage will be 4.5v and it will draw only 9 µA.
If even that much current were a concern, you could tie the bottom of the resistor divider into a open-drain output pin on the microcontroller and set it to ground only when you need to take a measurement. In that case, you could get by with lower value resistors.
EDIT:
As Russel McMahon mentions, many micros won't allow the input of the ADC rise much above their supply voltage (VDD), which would happen when the ground was removed on the resistor divider. So you would then need a high-side switch instead.