Electronic – OPA211 weird frequency response — why

I think you're on the right path, a couple of notes,

1) With a signal trace between two planes, the return current will split between the two planes, even if one of the planes is split. The return current cannot "see the future" and decide ahead of time which plane to return on. It will return above and below the trace until it sees the split at which point is says "oh crap!" and pays you back by possibly causing you to fail FCC testing. So you want to avoid running traces over plane splits even if another adjacent plane is not split. You can deal with splits with capacitors and such but this type of solution is less than ideal. I'd focus on always avoiding running a trace over a plane split on an adjacent plane.

2) Wide return paths on DC signals don't really matter.

3) You asked about two signal layers sharing the same plane. Usually, this is not a big deal if done properly. What many people do is use one of the layers as a "horizontal" signal layer and the other as a "vertical" signal layer so the return currents are orthogonal to each other. It is very common to route two signal layers for each plane, and use this horizontal/vertical technique. The most important thing to remember is to not change reference planes. Your setup could be a little tricky because going from the bottom layer to the 4th layer adds another return plane. More typical 6 layer boards are

1)ASignalHor 2)GND 3)ASignalVer 4)BSignalHor 5)POWER 6)BSignalVer

If you need smaller additional planes, like under the micro, these would usually be placed as an island on one of the signal layers. If you need to use more power planes, you might want to think about going to 10+ layers.

4) Plane spacing is important, and can have huge impact on performance, so you should specify this to the board house. If you take the example 6 layer stackup I mentioned above, spacing of .005 .005 .040 .005 .005 (instead of standard stackup with equal distance between layers) can make an order of magnitude improvement. It keeps the signal layers close to their reference plane (smaller loops).

Looking through the datasheet it looks like the CC6678 can operate in root complex mode so you should be able to connect the two. I did a similar board for testing a large batch of pcie cards.

Lanes

If I were going to try it I'd start with a 4 layer board. You're going to want nice 100Ohm differential pairs to connect your lanes together. It only supports 1 or two of them so that shouldn't be a problem. Just run them over a GND plane on layer two. Just follow good practice here for routing HS signals. Oh and Tx -> Rx, and watch your polarities :)

Clock

I saw the clock generator you picked from your other post, I'd probably put a 1->2 fanout buffer and drive one to each of your pcie slots.

Reset

You're going to need to generate a reset pulse for the cards as usually the mother board would do that. You could just slap down a simple supervisor that monitors 12V and tie it's reset output to both connectors. Maybe add a pushbutton too so you can reset manually during debug. I used a Linear LTC2916CDDB-1#TRMPBF.

Power

You're going to need 12V and 3.3V to power the connectors. I just used a standard desktop pc power supply because I had a bunch and they're easy to get. I just used a standard mother board power supply connector (Molex 44206-0007) and I put a little toggle switch from PS_ON to GND to turn things on and off. Oh and throw in a few 100uF tantalums on each rail for good measure.

Don't be nervous keep the lanes short, match the impedances and you should be fine.

Here's a pinout if you need one: