Okay, having decided to pitch myself at the PIC family (including dsPIC), I now have a question about programmers. I've been hearing a lot of bad things about the new PICKit 3, and am wondering if I should get that or the apparently more venerable PICKit 2? If I want to be able to use the newest PICs, I think I might need to buy the latest, but I'm not so sure. Thank you!
Electronic – Should I get the PICKit 2 or 3
microcontrollerpicprogrammer
Related Topic
- Customized PICKit can’t write data in PIC12F629
- Programming 16F84A With K8048 software & a custom Hardware (With CH340 USB2Ser)
- Electronic – PIC16F628A: 500ms delay (w/Timer 1) not as expected
- Electrical – software pwm with pic16F628A and XC8
- Electronic – PICKit 3 VDD Overcurrent
- Electronic – Using pickit 3 with DSPIC30F2010
- Electronic – PIC16F877A External Crystal giving 60Hz
Best Answer
I think the main reason behind PK3 hate is from this review by D.L. Jones. If you read (watch?) between the lines, D.L. Jones is upset because, well, the PK3 isn't the PK2. My response: It's a PIC chip programmer for hobby use, not for production work! Yes the physical UI is different between the two, but hey, your'e getting a OEM-supplied programmer for very little money that programs just about everything in their lineup (PK2 doesn't), so I wouldn't complain. Take what they give you! In the not-too-distant past, programmers were waay more expensive.
At work, we use ICD2 and ICD3 "hockey pucks" and the main reason we don't use PK2 is because the PK2 didn't support a particular micro we wanted to use in the past (the PK3 supports it now), so they had to upgrade. All of my coworkers said PK3 is probably a good way to start, since the part support problem seems to be resolved.