Electronic – SPICE model for one terminal spherical capacitor

capacitancespice

I have a circuit where at least some of the capacitance is coming from large, non-radiating, spherical conductors. I would like to model it in SPICE to better understand its operation– is such a thing possible? The capacitors I have available are all two terminal devices…

I know that the capacitance of my sphere is \$C=4\pi\epsilon_0 r\$, where \$r\$ is the radius of the sphere. I'm trying to figure out how to represent that in a SPICE circuit.

Updated to address points made in comments and answers:

Here is what I originally meant by "not coupled":

The self capacitance of a sphere is \$4\pi\epsilon r\$, where \$r\$ is the radius of the sphere.

If I have two spheres of equal radius the capacitance is:

\$2\pi\epsilon r \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{\sinh\left(\ln\left(\frac{d}{2r}+\sqrt{\left(\frac{d}{2r}\right)^2-1}\right)\right)}{\sinh\left(n\cdot\ln\left(\frac{d}{2r}+\sqrt{\left(\frac{d}{2r}\right)^2-1}\right)\right)}\$, where \$d\$ is the distance between sphere centers.

The summation limits to 1 as \$d\$ goes to infinity, and the remaining terms can probably be interpreted as the self capacitance of each sphere in series. So the total capacitance is the self capacitance of each in series, plus, what I will call a "mutual capacitance" caused by interaction of the electric fields and which is a function of distance.

By “not coupled”, I’d meant that this distance dependent mutual capacitance term is arbitrarily small, leaving only the self capacitance. Probably the wrong choice of language. The capacitance value is not dependent upon anything else in the circuit, but obviously Gauss’ Law still holds.

Best Answer

The capacitor is not coupled to the other nodes.

In this case, the capacitor is not affecting your circuit, so you needn't model it. By Kirchoff's current law, your circuit can't deliver any current onto the spherical capacitor without also being connected to whatever the spherical capacitor is coupled to (which is probably mostly earth ground).

If you want your circuit to be able to deliver charge to the spherical capacitor, you must also connect it to earth (or whatever ground-like object is near the capacitor). Then, of course, earth becomes a node in your circuit and it's no longer true that the capacitor is not connected ot other nodes of your circuit.

Responding to some comments:

Coupled how?

I was just using the word you used. I assumed you meant coupled by electric field lines between the sphere and the things it might be coupled to.

Capacitance is a measure of the energy stored in the electric field, but surely I could raise a sphere far enough from earth that the field strength is negligible on the ground and still store charge (and energy) on the sphere.

You'd have to transport the charge to the sphere from somewhere. That would form a circuit including that other place.

If the charge comes from somewhere in your circuit (elevated in space along with the sphere), then you already had a charge imbalance between the sphere+circuit system and the earth (however far away), and you'd have already had an electric field developed. Moving the charge from the other circuit elements to the sphere wouldn't appreciably change the field between the sphere+circuit system and the earth, so it wouldn't store any additional energy.

Is using KCL circular reasoning: all the current entering a junction must leave the junction therefore there must be a junction?

KCL can also be applied to any closed surface. If you define a closed surface surrounding the spherical capacitor and the rest of your circuit, then the net current across that surface must be zero. Obviously since you've imposed this surface between the sphere and ground (or whatever) you have to include displacement current.