Electronic – Standard Relay vs SSR vs TRIAC for Switching CFLs

Thyristors (triacs and their unidirectional cousins, SCRs) are solid-state devices, whereas relays are electromechanical devices. Triacs can switch both AC and DC, but as XTL said, they will not stop the current flow unless the current between MT1 and MT2 falls below a threshold level, or you forcibly commutate the device off.

(note: I spent 13 years in industrial motor control, we designed equipment which switched up to many thousands of Amps and many thousands of Volts through thyristors.)

Relays are pretty simple devices to use; you energize the coil and the contacts engage. You de-energize the coil and the contacts open. A simple transistor can drive it, but you'll want some snubbering (a reverse-biased diode across the relay coil at a minimum) to prevent your transistor from dying due to inductive kickback. Your control signal and your controlled signal are completely isolated from one another.

Relay contacts aren't invincible; if you open up the contacts under load you can cause them to "ice up" (meaning they won't open up). Also, if you use a relay rated for power and try to switch small signals, the contacts can eventually get dirty and you won't get a good connection between the contacts.

Triacs, being solid-state, are mostly silent. Unless you use a pulse transformer or optoisolator, your control circuit will be at the potential of your controlled circuit (generally the Neutral for your 120/220V circuits). Thyristors can be used to phase-control a load, meaning you can dim lights or (roughly) control the speed of an AC motor. This is pretty much impossible with relays. You can also do neat tricks like allowing only 'x' entire cycles through to do less "noisy" phase control. SCRs are also good for dumping all the energy in a capacitor into a load (flash or railgun type applications). Some power supplies use SCRs as crowbar devices as well; they turn on and short out the supply (blowing the fuse in the process), protecting the load from an overvoltage.

Thyristors don't really enjoy sharp voltage or current spikes when they're turned off; these can cause them to turn on by accident or can destroy the devices. Simple snubbering helps control these failure modes.

Thyristors also don't completely isolate the load from the source; if you measure the voltage on a load with the thyristor off, you'll measure full voltage. They thyristor is off, but off doesn't mean "open" -- it means "high resistance". This can cause trouble with some applications.

If you are switching an AC signal, thyristors are pretty painless; they will shut themselves off around the next zero crossing. If you're controlling DC... again... you have more to think about. DC is also problematic for relays because you will almost always be opening up the relay contacts under load, so you must size your relay for this.

Long story short: Yes, triacs can replace relays in almost every application. If you don't want to bother with the snubbering and isolation you can always buy solid state relays; they're triacs with the appropriate control circuitry to make them work almost the same as relays.

The SSR is a low voltage DC device, but may also be used for low voltage AC, while the triac device is for AC usage only, typically mains voltage.

A triac has a PNPN-structure, which means that there will always be a voltage drop across it, while FETs are resistive devices, and for those an \$R_{ON}\$ is specified, in this case 0.25\$\Omega\$ maximum.
The voltage drop over the triac makes opto-triacs less convenient for low voltages, where they may drop out too much of the available voltage. For instance a 3V drop on a 24V supply means that you lose 13%. So it looks like in your case the "SSR" is a better choice. You'll have to look at the maximum current, though. The datasheet says 2A, but on the Absolute Maximum Ratings graph it shows 1A. My guess is that this should be read as a normalized value, and that the actual maximum is indeed 2A, to be derated at higher temperatures.