Electronic – Stepper motor torque constant and electrical constant

stepper motor

I'm stuck with a problem regarding hybrid stepping motors and I'm not sure where I'm wrong.

I can't reconcile the torque constant with the maximum speed of a hybrid stepping motor with the following nameplate:

Holding torque = 9 Nm

Rated current = 10 A

Steps/rev = 200

Rated power = 40 W

The problem, in short, is this. The torque constant of this motor is 0.9 Nm/A, which (give or take some possible coefficients due to the multiphase nature of the machine or to the sinusoidal nature of the back-emf) is also the voltage constant in V/(rad/s) that yields the back-emf given the speed. The data sheet also gives the torque/speed characteristic: with a 24 V supply, the maximum speed is 6000 pps. With 200 steps/rev, 6000 pps is 30 rev/s, or 188 rad/s (mechanical). Now, if we multiply 188 rad/s times the voltage constant of 0.9, we get 169 V! How on Earth can a motor run on 24 V when its back-emf is 169 V? It should never be able to reach such speed.

I tried to write this off as a mistake in the data sheet, but then all the data sheets from this manufacturer must be wrong. Moreover, I found another data sheet from another manufacturer with the same problem (too high maximum speed given the supply voltage and machine constant).

What am I doing wrong? Thanks in advance to anyone who can shed some light.

Best Answer

Here is a hybrid stepper spec that shows them being equal, as expected:

Insulation class: Class B.

Dielectric strength: 500VDC for one minute.
Insulation resistance: 100MΩMin., 500VDC.

Electrical Specifications:
Model:  86BLS98 .
Number of poles: 8.
Number of phase: 3.
Rated voltage(DC): 48V.
Rated speed: 3000RPM.
Rated torque:  1.4N.m/197.2oz.in.
Rated Power: 440W.
Peak Torque: 4.2N.m/591.5oz.in.
Peak current: 33A.
Resistance: 0.2 ohms.
Inductance: 0.48mH±20%.
Torque constant: 0.13 Nm/A.
Back E.M.F: 13.5 V/KRPM.
Rotor inertia: 1600 g.cm2
Body length: 98mm/3.9in.

0.13Nm/A so \$K_T\$ = 0.13

13.5V/1000 RPM so 13.5V/16.66 rotations/s or 105 rad/s so \$K_E\$ = 0.13 .

Could be a mistake in their data I guess.