I've a bus synchronizer circuit for passing a wide register across clock domains.
I'll provide a simplified description, omitting asynchronous reset logic.
The data is generated on one clock. Updates are many (at least a dozen) clock edges apart:
PROCESS (src_clk)
BEGIN
IF RISING_EDGE(clock) THEN
IF computation_done THEN
data <= computation;
ready_spin <= NOT ready_spin;
END IF;
END IF;
END PROCESS;
The control signal for fresh data, which is NRZI encoded (so a valid word on the bus corresponds to a transition on the control signal). The control signal passes through a DFF chain acting as a synchronizer.
PROCESS (dest_clk)
BEGIN
IF RISING_EDGE(dest_clk) THEN
ready_spin_q3 <= ready_spin_q2;
ready_spin_q2 <= ready_spin_q1;
ready_spin_q1 <= ready_spin;
END IF;
END PROCESS;
The synchronizer circuit introduces a short delay, which provides plenty of time for the data bus to stabilize; the data bus is sampled directly without a risk of metastability:
PROCESS (dest_clk)
BEGIN
IF RISING_EDGE(dest_clk) THEN
IF ready_spin_q3 /= ready_spin_q2 THEN
rx_data <= data;
END IF;
END IF;
END PROCESS;
This compiles, and works well when synthesized into a Cyclone II FPGA. However, TimeQuest reports setup and hold time violations, because it doesn't recognize the synchronizer. Worse, the Quartus manual says
Focus on improving the paths that show the worst slack. The Fitter works hardest on
paths with the worst slack. If you fix these paths, the Fitter might be able to improve
the other failing timing paths in the design.
So I want to add the right timing constraints to my project so that Quartus will spend its Fitter effort on other areas of the design.
I'm pretty sure that set_multicycle_path
is the proper SDC (Synopsis Design Constraint) command, since the data lines will have multiple cycles of the destination clock to stabilize, but I can't find any complete examples using this command to describe clock domain crossing logic.
I'd really appreciate some guidance on writing SDC timing constraints for synchronizers. If you see a problem with this approach, please also let me know that.
Clock detail:
External clock generator: Two channels, refclk = 20 MHz, refclk2 = refclk/2 (10 MHz, and related).
Altera PLL: src_clk = refclk * 9/5 = 36 MHz
Altera PLL: dest_clk = refclk2 * 10 = 100 MHz
I also have data going the other direction, with 100 MHz src_clk and 36 MHz dest_clk.
TL;DR: What are the correct SDC timing constraints for the above code?
Best Answer
I don't have experience with Quartus, so treat this as general advice.
When working on paths between clock domains, timing tools expand the clocks to the least common multiple of their periods and select the closest pair of edges.
For paths from a 36 MHz clock (27.777 ns) to a 100 MHz clock (10 ns), if I did my quick calculations correctly, the closest pair of rising edges is 138.888 ns on the source clock and 140 ns on the destination clock. That's effectively a 900 MHz constraint for those paths! Depending on rounding (or for clocks with no relationship), it could come out worse than that.
There are at least three ways to write constraints for this structure. I am going to call the clocks
fast_clk
andslow_clk
as I think that's clearer for illustration.Option 1: disable timing with
set_false_path
The easiest solution is to use
set_false_path
to disable timing between the clocks:This is not strictly correct, since there are timing requirements for the synchronizer to work correctly. If the physical implementation delays the data too much relative to the control signal, then the synchronizer will not work. However, since there isn't any logic on the path, it's unlikely that the timing constraint will be violated.
set_false_path
is commonly used for this kind of structure, even in ASICs, where the effort vs. risk tradeoff for low-probability failures is more cautious than for FPGAs.Option 2: relax the constraint with
set_multicycle_path
You can allow additional time for certain paths with
set_multicycle_path
. It is more common to use multicycle paths with closely related clocks (e.g. interacting 1X and 2X clocks), but it will work here if the tool supports it sufficiently.The default edge relationship for setup is single cycle, i.e.
set_multicycle_path 1
. These commands allow one more cycle of the endpoint clock (-end
) for setup paths. The-hold
adjustment with a number one less than the setup constraint is almost always needed when setting multi cycle paths, for more see below.To constrain paths in the other direction similarly (relaxing the constraint by one period of the faster clock), change
-end
to-start
:Option 3: specify requirement directly with
set_max_delay
This is similar to the effect of
set_multicycle_path
but saves having to think through the edge relationships and the effect on hold constraints.You may want to pair this with
set_min_delay
for hold checks, or leave the default hold check in place. You may also be able to doset_false_path -hold
to disable hold checks, if your tool supports it.Gory details of edge selection for multi-cycle paths
To understand the hold adjustment that gets paired with each setup adjustment, consider this simple example with a 3:2 relationship. Each digit represents a rising clock edge:
The default setup check uses edges 2 and 6. The default hold check uses edges 1 and 4.
Applying a multi-cycle constraint of 2 with
-end
adjusts the default setup and hold checks to use the next edge after what they were originally using, meaning the setup check now uses edges 2 and 7 and the hold check uses edges 1 and 5. For two clocks at the same frequency, this adjustment makes sense — each data launch corresponds with one data capture, and if the capture edge is moved out by one, the hold check should also move out by one. This kind of constraint might make sense for two branches of a single clock if one of the branches has a large delay. However, for the situation here, a hold check using edges 1 and 5 isn't desirable, since the only way to fix it is to add an entire clock cycle of delay on the path.The multi-cycle hold constraint of 1 (for hold, the default is 0) adjusts the edge of the destination clock uesd for hold checks backwards by one edge. The combination of 2-cycle setup MCP and 1-cycle hold MCP constraints will result in a setup check using edges 2 and 7, and a hold check using edges 1 and 4.