Here's a current limiter circuit that uses the negative feedback to limit the current to a certain point.
simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab
I have not studied feedback systems before as I'm not an EE student just do it for fun. But here's what I know about this circuit:
When the current through R2 increases the voltage on the base-emitter would also increase. When the voltage reaches about 600mV Q1 will start to conduct. The collector current in Q1 will pull the gate voltage down due to R1 turning the mosfet off, hence reducing the current through the LED. Probably this will continue until Vbe and Vgs reach a certain set point.
Using the equation for a negative feedback loop, assuming the open loop voltage gain is G, we get for the closed-looped voltage gain
$$GV=\frac{G}{1+\beta G}$$
where the denominator takes account for the feedback fraction. Knowing all of this I want to calculate the Vbe and from that measure the current through the LED.
I know the open loop gain of the CE stage but don't know how to start off. I also don't know how to calculate the feedback fraction. I have not seen a practical example of such a circuit before. I want to go through each feedback loop and calculate everything, and finally get a good estimation for all circuit parameters. So any hint would be appreciated.
Here are some observations(out of breadboard):
For Vcc=5V and LED's FWD equal to 2V, I got the following readings:
Vbe=0.47V
Vgs=3.8V
I(led)=40-50mA
UPDATE 1:
I have written a simple code in matlab that runs through a loop for 5000 times, each time calculating a Vbe based on a new Ic.
I used the fact that for a silicon NPN BJT the collector current is 4mA at Vbe=0.7V. For Is I took 8.11*10^-15A. I got a wide range of results as you see below. To save space I've kept some interesting ones. Here's the code and the output:
function clcm()
I=4E-3;
Vbe=0.7;
Ic=40E-6;
Is=8.11E-15;
Vt=26E-3;
R=zeros(10,3);
for i=1:5000
Vbe=Vbe-Vt*log(I/Ic);
I=Ic;
Ic=Is*exp(Vbe/Vt);
R(i,1)=i;R(i,2)=Vbe;R(i,3)=Ic;
end
disp(num2str(R))
end
Here's the output with the 2nd column indicating the Vbe and the 3rd showing corresponding Ic:
1 0.58026558 3.9954399e-05
2 0.58023592 3.9908849e-05
3 0.58020626 3.9863352e-05
4 0.5801766 3.9817906e-05
5 0.58014694 3.9772512e-05
6 0.58011729 3.972717e-05
7 0.58008763 3.968188e-05
8 0.58005797 3.9636641e-05
9 0.58002831 3.9591454e-05
10 0.57999865 3.9546318e-05
3630 0.4726373 6.3647499e-07
3631 0.47260765 6.3574938e-07
3632 0.47257799 6.3502461e-07
3633 0.47254833 6.3430065e-07
3634 0.47251867 6.3357753e-07
3635 0.47248901 6.3285523e-07
3636 0.47245936 6.3213375e-07
3637 0.4724297 6.314131e-07
3638 0.47240004 6.3069326e-07
3639 0.47237038 6.2997425e-07
4991 0.43227299 1.347568e-07
4992 0.43224334 1.3460317e-07
4993 0.43221368 1.3444972e-07
4994 0.43218402 1.3429644e-07
4995 0.43215436 1.3414334e-07
4996 0.4321247 1.3399041e-07
4997 0.43209505 1.3383766e-07
4998 0.43206539 1.3368508e-07
4999 0.43203573 1.3353267e-07
5000 0.43200607 1.3338044e-07
The Vbe=0.46V is what I exactly measured. I also measured collector current at about 6.8uA so it doesn't agree with what I got above. There should be some constraint that forces me to stop running the code up to a specific iteration, because it's giving me a broad range of currents and voltages. We know the system in a negative feedback should reach equilibrium somewhere.
UPDATE 2:
Here I have plotted the I-V characteristic of the BJT using the data I found above:
Here's the actual behavior of the circuit simulated in LTspice:
where V(n004) is the base-emitter voltage. As you see it doesn't agree with the above schematic. I'm actually trying to understand how I should modify the code to achieve the predicted result.
Best Answer
To determine the loopgain properly you would need to make a small-signal equivalent of the circuit. The method of doing that will drag you straight into EE Analog circuit analysis territory. It's too complex to explain that all here so have a look here.
Since I know how to do this already I can tell you that in 1st order (omitting some 2nd order effects) the open loopgain is roughly:
$$G= gm * R1$$
Where
$$gm= 40 * I_{c,q1}$$
So we only need to know Ic,q1.
First determine the voltage across R1: 5V - Vgs,M1 - Vbe,q1 = 5 - 3.8 - 0.47 = 0.73 V
The current flowing through R1 is 0.73/120k ohm = 6.1 uA
The same current is flowing through Q1 so gm = 40 * 6.1 uA = 240 uA/V
So G = 240 uA/V * 120 kohm = 29
Maybe you wonder why the gain of NMOS M1 is not in this equation, it is because M1 is configured as a common drain or source follower. This means it has a voltage gain of about 1 so I neglected it. Only if M1 was a very small NMOS like an on-chip NMOS would it have such a small W/L that the gain would be significantly smaller than 1. But this is a switching NMOS and these have very large W/L to get the small Rds,on value needed for switching MOSFETs.
Also R2 does not come into the equation as the voltage across it is (in 1st order) set by M1, if R2 had a different value M1 would simply provide more or less current. Again this is a 1st order approach, if you'd calculate in more detail you would find R2 influencing the loopgain. In the 1st order approach, the value of R2 only determines the DC biasing current.
As an (on-chip) circuit designer I would not do this calculation for this type of circuit as it is a well-known "local feedback" construction with a clear dominant pole (at the gate of M1) and therefore it will always be stable and will simply work as long as you dimension it properly such that all the DC voltages in the circuit remain "sensible".