power supplyremote controlschematics
Okay so I have two questions. I am looking at a schematic diagram of a remote control for a toy car and I can't seem to figure out what the "n/o" and "n/c" components stand for that are attached to the motor supply. Also not sure if they are the same component or they just have different looks. My other questions is what is the RL1 component with the swirls and the two lines?
What's considered the maximum number of parts on a single page?
Depends on the size of the page. You can fit more on a D-sized plotter sheet than a B-sized (roughly A4) sheet. Don't crowd things to the point it gets difficult to read.
What to consider when making a schematic multiple pages?
Almost all my designs end up as multiple sheets. Sometimes the manufacturing guys cut them all up and paste them together in one big plotter sheet to make it easier to follow the signal flow. But normally I don't print out bigger than 11x17 so I work at that size.
Something you didn't ask: I tend to make the first sheet be the critical input and output connections of my circuit, and work up towards more complex circuits on later pages. Other people like to put the critical signal path parts on the first page, and the input and output connections end up deep in the stack of schematics. I'm not sure which is really better.
When should I consider putting multiple tracks into a buss?
I rarely do this, but its a matter of style (and convention in your workgroup).
How should I name busses, netlists, and the references to other pages?
I tend toward all-caps net names, but otherwise I don't have fixed rules. More disciplined organizations might have more detailed rules.
How should I place components to minimize the number of nets?
I prefer to place components to make the signal flow clear. I don't worry about the number of named nets.
What kind of comments should I include on a schematic?
Anything important for the layout guy to know (matched length traces, place bypass caps near ICs, etc.) Anything a future engineer might need to know if they're looking to replace an obsolete part. Non-obvious critical specs like higher-than-normal resistor power requirements or tight tolerances. Anything that has to be tuned in production (Like "tune pot to achieve 50% duty cycle" or whatever).
Where should I place the designation and value for horizontal and vertical components? Does it matter as long as I stay consistent?
I use vertical text for vertical components to allow more parts to fit cleanly on a sheet. Others (apparently) consider this a grave sin. Be consistent and be consistent with others in your organization.
Should I note component packaging & rating on the schematic? Meaning discrete vs SMD or if a specific resistor is high powered?
Specifying the package type for each part visibly on the schematic would be clutter. But obviously that information has to be in the design to get transferred to layout. As mentioned above mention nonobvious specs that might trip someone up if they have to replace an obsolete part or find an alternate vendor due to a shortage.
Your BOM (Bill of Materials) will need to specify an exact manufacturers part number (or a list of acceptable alternates called an AVL "approved vendor list") for each part.
Should I customize nets in different colors or widths?
I don't recommend this. I'd prefer to get schematics that make sense if printed out in black & white.
How should I version control schematics?
I store datecoded backups (like "mydesign_20120205.zip" on my own pc and a remote share drive. Definitely store a backup whenever you release a design (either to layout or to manufacturing).
Edit: There are better ways to do this (see comments) but a simple process like dated zip files is also perfectly workable.
What workflow should a single person use to keep designs organized?
Keep backups. Use all the tools you have available. If you aren't doing your own layout, keep good communication with the layout guy.
It's a flexible connection of some kind. In this drawing, it is likely to represent a trailing or reeling cable (I will explain this a bit more below.)
Supporting my claim - from AS1102.3 Graphical symbols for electrotechnical documentation - Part 103: Conductors and connecting devices, we have:
Note AS1102 is based on IEC 617 Graphical symbols for diagrams.
Contrast the symbol for a jumper ("connecting link"), also from AS1102.3, and a fuse, from AS1102.7.
A trailing or reeling cable is used to power mobile equipment, i.e. a mobile drilling rig, or mobile substation.
In this application, I think the 'sub-sea' transformer is in some kind of waterproof container, connected to the surface supply by trailing cables. Flexibility is required for the transformer to be moved around, or to move with the water currents.
Note that trailing cables are a special breed, not like regular cables. See Olex catalogue for trailing and reeling cables. Generally these cables are much more flexible than normal cables, are designed to withstand cars running over them, etc. There are also special protection features to detect if the cable has been damaged - these aren't required for normal cables which spend most of their life living in a protected environment, i.e. conduits.
Best Answer
RL1 is a relay, a type of electrically-actuated mechanical switch. The swirls are the relay's coil, and the two lines indicate that it's wrapped around a magnetic core.
The thing labelled N/O and N/C is also part of the relay; N/O is "normally open", which means that switch contact is open, or disconnected, when the relay coil is not energized. N/C likewise is "normally closed", which means that switch contact is closed, i.e. connected, when the relay coil is not energized. When a current is flowing through the relay coil, the magnetic field it creates pulls the switch over, opening the NC contact and closing the NO one.
Note that in the context of integrated circuits you may see "NC" used to mean "not connected", but here with it being next to a relay's contacts it's pretty unambiguous.