Why is the resistor voltage initially equal to supply voltage? Is it because there is no voltage going across the capacitor yet? Therefore, as there is no voltage drop across the capacitor, all the voltage from the battery is across the resistor?
Sum of voltages on the passive elements must add up to the supply voltage.
$$
V_{supply}(t) = V_{switch}(t) + V_{resistor}(t) + V_{capacitor}(t)
$$
Because of the fact that \$V_{switch}(t) = 0 \$ and \$V_{capacitor}(0) = 0 \$, \$V_{resistor}(0)\$ must be equal to \$V_{supply}(0)\$.
2.What exactly does "the voltage developed as the capacitor charges" refer to?
When you apply a voltage difference between capacitor plates, one plate has more positive potential with respect to the other one. This initiates an electric field field between the plates, which is a vector field, whose direction is from the positive plate the negative one.
There is an insulating material (dielectric material) between these capacitor plates. This dielectric material has no free electrons, so no charge flows through it. But another phenomenon occurs. The negatively charged electrons of the dielectric material tend to the positive plate, while the nucleus of the atoms/molecules shift to the negative plate. This causes a difference in the locations of "center of charge" of electrons and molecules in the dielectric field. This difference create tiny displacement dipols (electric field vectors) inside the dielectric material. This field makes the free electrons in the positive plate go away, while it collects more free electrons to the negative plate. This is how charge is collected in the capacitor plates.
3.Am i correct in assuming that the resistor voltage drops because the capacitor's voltage is increasing? (kirchoff's law where volt rise = volt drop).
As the capacitor voltage increases, the voltage across the resistor will decrease accordingly because of the Kirchoff's Law, which I formulated above. So, yes, you were correct.
1.If the capacitor's voltage is dropping(due to it being discharged), shouldn't the resistor's voltage be increasing due to kirchoff's law? Also,this should therefore INCREASE the current instead of decreasing it, which would then cause the capacitor to discharge even faster?
You are missing the fact that, the source voltage is zero (i.e.; the voltage source is missing) in the discharge circuit. Substitude \$V_{supply}(t)=0\$ in the formula above. The capacitor voltage will be equal to the resistor voltage in reverse polarities during the discharge. Together, they will tend to zero.
KVL can be more generally stated as: the electric field is a conservative vector field. This can be expressed by the path integral:
\begin{align}
\int_{p1}^{p2} \vec{E} \cdot d\vec{l} = V_{p2} - V_{p1}
\end{align}
I.E. the integral is "path independent", and the result is the same no matter what path you take (so long as you start at p1 and end at p2). This can be 0, but it doesn't have to be. If \$p1=p2\$ (taking a closed path),
\begin{align}
\oint \vec{E} \cdot d\vec{l} = 0
\end{align}
This is why KVL even applies: KVL states that in any closed loop, the voltage across it is 0. It doesn't mean that the voltage must be 0 between any two points on that loop. It doesn't matter if there is any conductive path between two points. Having an ideal wire is just an extra statement that two distinct points are at the same voltage.
Best Answer
To me, Kirchoff's Laws are scientific wording of what should be common-sense observations of electric circuits. Unfortunately, common sense isn't as common as we might like.
KVL says that the total of the voltage drops in a circuit must equal the supplied voltage. If that was not true, we would have some voltage across a wire which would result in approximately infinite current in that wire - but KCL insists that the current is the same at all points in a simple series circuit, so we can't have a huge current at one point in the circuit.
If you connect a device that normally requires 4 volts across a 6 volt battery, sufficient current will flow to make the resulting circuit comply with KVL. The voltage across the "4 volt device" will rise, and the output voltage of the battery will fall (due to a voltage drop across the internal resistance of the battery) such that the voltage across the battery and the device are equal. This may result in the destruction of the 4 volt device, if it cannot withstand the extra voltage and current.
Regarding your second point: the voltage drop across a resistor will depend on its resistance, and on the current passing through it, in accordance with Ohm's Law.
For your example of a 10 Ohm resistor across a 30 volt supply, the current through the resistor will be 3 amps, and the voltage across the resistor will be 30 volts. If you add a second 10 Ohm resistor in series, the load on the power supply is now 20 Ohms, so, by Ohm's Law, the current through the resistors will be 1.5 amps, and there will be 15 volts dropped across each resistor, for a total voltage drop of 30 volts.
If you put the two 10 Ohm resistors in parallel across the 30 volt supply, each resistor will now see 30 volts, and will each pass 3 Amps, so the supply will have to supply 6 Amps.