Electronic – When to avoid using a breadboard

Look at the breadboard view of Fritzing.

I have never bothered with a complicated circuit on a solderless breadboard. It's usually less trouble to just start soldering things together on a 0.1" protoboard.

Breadboards are best for quick, small "will this work" circuits. And who cares if those look a bit messy.

1) Physical breadboards are available with core sections and bus sections as individual dockable modules, so the arrangement you show is realizable but my personal preference would be for a pair of bus row on top and bottom as well.

2) Spacing seems to be right for the core module, should be 300 mills or 3 units between top and bottom halves. However the spacing on your bus rows is different than the physical example in front of me, which has 5 holes lining up with those in the core, then one missing, then another 5, etc. The spacing across the gap to the bus row is also 300 mill.

3) I'm not sure I'd say confusing, but the color choices and graphic thicknesses induces eye strain. Consider taking a photo and more closely duplicating that with more shades of color.

Reading your question I immediately wondered if you know about http://fritzing.org/ - at the least, check it out and identify in your own mind the reasons why your open source effort should be separate from theirs. You don't have to post your conclusions, but if you decide to remain distinct thinking about how yours would be better may provide some useful guidance.