Electronic – Why does the Intel Atom processor need so much thermal dissipation compared to similar ARM processors

embeddedintelmicroprocessorthermal

When looking at cases designed around the Intel NUC Atom-based board it seems they put a lot of effort into thermal dissipation (i.e. the entire case is basically a big heatsink). Of course, these cases are fanless and the logic goes that since there is no fan you need to get rid of heat by some other means – hence the huge heatsink.

However, my smartphone contains a very comparable processor (Qualcomm Snapdragon) and my phone contains neither a fan nor that huge heatsink. The TDP for the Intel Atom is advertised as 5W whereas it seems the Snapdragon is closer to 2.5W .

My questions are:

  • Is the Snapdragon's thermal design just so vastly superior to that of the Intel Atom processor or is there some benefit to the Intel Atom that I'm missing?
  • Also, assuming that the 5W/2.5W numbers are accurate, does that justify the huge difference between cooling solutions?
  • Are there any other solutions (for running a linux-based appliance) that I should look at that have solid industrial support but neither require a huge heatsink nor a fan?

Best Answer

The atom processor is based on an older architecture, plus it has to carry the baggage of being PC-compatible. So it is more complicated to implement therefore requiring significantly more transistors for similar capabilities. I believe the term RISC came after the x86 was well on its way.