Thevenin Equivalent circuit for T feedback network of inverting ideal op amp

analogoperational-amplifierthevenin

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

I am trying to reduce the T feedback network(R2 R3 R4) into a Thevenin equivalent circuit looking into the network from the v- (inverting) terminal. The Thevenin equivalent circuit I get is this:

schematic

simulate this circuit
It is easy to see that Voc is just a voltage divider. To calculate the equivalent resistance a test source would be inserted then Isc (short circuit current) would be calculated and then the equivalent resistance is given by $$R_{th} = \frac{V_{oc}}{I_{sc}}$$ This bring me to my question: Is it possible to short the dependent source since $$ A(V_{+}-V_{-})$$ will equal some finite value that is independent of the thevenin equivalent; thus the VCVS is actually independent of this equivalent circuit and can be shorted like an independent source?

The book I'm reading gives the equivalent resistance as $$R_{th} = R_2+R4 || R3$$ Which would suggest that the dependent source has been shorted. To my knowledge we have to use a test source to determine equivalent parameters when there are dependent sources. Is this just a coincidence or can someone explain why we are able to short this VCVS.

Best Answer

If you think about it that VCVS is not dependent. It depends on some parameters that are not part of the circuit you are analyzing, so you can turn it off (better than saying "short it" in my opinion.

You can also see this from another point of view: if you include the \$V^+V^-\$ part of the circuit and connect a generator to these terminals, then you should turn it off, then \$A(V^+-V^-)=0\$. Or you can just say that if you only have dependent sources in a circuit, then the "all nodes are at 0V" solution works, and some backend math tells us that in a nice network the solution is uniqe if it exists, so also if you don't include the generator on the op amp input terminals you can say well the output must be zero.

Understood this the solution is trivial and it's precisley what your book reports.