The signal-to-noise ratio needed for \$\mathrm{32\ kbit/s}\$ with a bandwith of \$\mathrm{100\ kHz}\$ is calculated in the following way:
\$\underbrace{C=B\cdot \log_2{\left(1+\dfrac SN\right)}}_{\textrm{Shannon's equation}}\longrightarrow \dfrac CB=\log_2{\left(1+\dfrac SN\right)}\longrightarrow 2^\frac{C}{B}=1+\frac SN\longrightarrow \frac SN=2^\frac CB - 1\$
If we substitute the values in the equation we get:
\$\dfrac SN=2^\frac{32\cdot 10^{3}\ \textrm{bits/s}}{10^5\ \textrm{Hz}} - 1=2^{0.32} - 1=0.2483\longrightarrow 10\cdot\log_{10}{(0.2483)}=-6.05\textrm{ dB}\$.
In Shannon's equation:
- C is the channel capacity in bits per second;
- B is the bandwidth of the channel in hertz;
- S is the average signal power received over the bandwidth in watts;
- N is the average noise power received over the bandwidth in watts;
- S/N is the signal-to-noise-ratio as a linear power ratio (not as decibels)
Sources:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shannon%E2%80%93Hartley_theorem
https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scots_Guide/iandm/part8/page1.html
The formula is derived from practical experiences and not from mathematical 1st principles. It is unprovable other than by being practical and thinking what a diode detector has to achieve.
Firstly, the formula states that RC has to be equal to or greater than \$\dfrac{1}{\omega_c}\$.
If the RC time constant were too short there would be significant levels (ripple) of the carrier frequency on the output - this is not what is wanted from a diode detector (or an AC rectifier in a power supply) BUT, it's never going to be a perfect brick wall filter and so carrier ripple has to be acceptable (to some degree).
Personally, I would like to see the RC time constant 5 times greater than \$\dfrac{1}{\omega_c}\$
At the other end of the scale, RC cannot be too big or it will start to significantly attenuate high frequencies in the "detected" analogue waveform that is represented by \$\dfrac{1}{\omega_m}\$.
Here is a picture that hopefully explains: -
This picture was taken from here and basically is saying, if the modulation index is too high for the value of RC chosen there will come a point in the detection of the signal that the RC time constant is too long.
You should also note that as the modulation index approaches 1, the RC time constant has to theoretically be very small and this will make it likely clash with the requirement for it to be significantly greater than \$\dfrac{1}{\omega_c}\$.
Best Answer
This document entitled Frequency Modulation (FM) Tutorial by Lawrence Der, Ph.D. of Silicon Laboratories Inc. shows that: -
What the above is saying is that if FM deviation doubled (transmission band width doubled), SNR would increase 8 times. See also this from wiki: -
In your question there has to be some form of error because if SNR is "directly proportional to BW\$^2\$" and BW doubles then SNR must rise by 4.
Basically, you can't prove something that is wrong without lying or some form of deception.