First, it's absolutely expected that the output current and input current (averaged over a switching cycle) are not equal in a switching converter. If the currents were equal, the efficiency couldn't be any better than a linear regulator's.
Now, let's look at a simple buck regulator:
When the switch (Q1) is closed the input current does indeed go into the load. But part of it also goes to recharging Cout, whose voltage has drooped during the "off" part of the cycle.
When the switch is open, the load still receives current, but it's supplied by D1 and Cout.
So there's no concern that by not drawing input current during part of the cycle you might fail to provide power to the load. It's just part of how a buck converter works.
Would a large capacitor on the input of my step-down converter do the trick?
A large capacitor (Cin in the schematic) won't change the fact that when the switch is open, no input current is drawn.
What it will do is, when the switch is closed, allow much of the input current to come from Cin instead of from the upstream voltage source. This current will be flowing in a relatively small loop, and so not produce so much EMI issues as if it had to flow from the upstream source, however far away that might be.
It also means that whatever inductance there is in the lines from the upstream source to your circuit won't cause Vin to droop during the "on" part of the switching cycle and interfere with the converter's operation.
Edit
I realized you're worried about the peak current drawn during the "on" part of the cycle being higher than the PoE can supply.
Yes, a larger Cin will help with that, by smoothing out the current drawn over the switching cycle. But basically any capacitance on the load side of the PoE will also help.
The choice of operating frequency and L1 value will also affect the peak current draw on the input.
The open circuit voltage is the voltage you must expect from the solar panel under no load (zero current draw).
(image source)
All DC-DC converters (even high efficiency ones) have a minimum input current consumption. But in most cases it'll be low enough (compared to the current capability of the solar panel) to be considered considered almost zero.
Thus, your DC-DC converter must be able to accept the full open circuit voltage at its input, just in case it doesn't have a load connected at the output. The DC-DC converter should be able to deal with the line voltage variation imposed by the panel (most of them are able to) as well.
Also, as suggested by Rohat Kılıç in the comments to your post, you should consider a DC-DC converter with an input range wider than the nominal one required, in order to avoid nasty surprises. The open circuit voltage depends on temperature and other environmental and operating factors, so taking adequate design margins will definitively be a good idea in this case.
Best Answer
In a buck converter, the schottky diode (that you may be referring to) is absolutely needed. Don't even think about leaving it out - you'll be just wasting your time. When the transistor "opens" after pushing current into the inductor, that current needs to keep flowing to carry on passing energy into the output capacitor. Without the diode (schottky or otherwise) this current can't flow into the output cap so instead it creates a big voltage spike and destroys the switching transistor in the chip.
If you are referring to a diode placed in series with the power feed to the battery then it's likely this is also needed for two reasons: -