the oscillator is designed to drive a high-impedance IC clock input
In this case, you will want to add a buffer chip to be able to drive the 50 Ohm coax and the spectrum analyzer input. The appropriate chip depends on what type of load the oscillator is designed to drive (TTL, CMOS, ...?), the frequency, the available power supply voltages, etc.
Possibly you could use a transformer instead of an IC buffer to impedance-match the cable, but the buffer has the advantage of providing exactly the type of load the oscillator is designed for (an IC input).
Incidentally, if you want to measure the frequency accuracy of your oscillator and not other parameters, a frequency counter will give you a more accurate measurement more quickly than a spectrum analyzer. But it will still likely have a 50 Ohm input unless you're working at very low frequencies (below 1 MHz?).
simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab
You're going to run into some accuracy issues such as:
- noise from the 5V line
- self heating
- possible voltage drop (due to length of wire)
I would just go with a one wire thermometer like the DS18B20/DS18S20. Using a digital sensor, less immune to noise. You can even run it at a much longer distance. There's a library for the Arduino already. Anyway, that's my route.
Going with your route:
If you only want the temperature range from 20C to 30C, you're going to have to play around with your resistor to get that range. For example, at 20C the nominal resistance is 1922ohms and at 30C, 2080ohms.
So voltage divider states yields:
$$@20C: V_o = V_i\cdot\frac{R_s}{R_s+R1} = 5V\cdot\frac{1922}{1922+1000} = 3.288V$$
$$@30C: V_o = V_i\cdot\frac{R_s}{R_s+R1} = 5V\cdot\frac{2080}{2080+1000} = 3.376V$$
Difference is 0.08778V or 87.78mV. Since arduino's analog uses 10b (1023): \$\frac{5V}{1023} = 4.888mV/\mathsf{step}\$. This should have yielded 17.9 steps (\$\frac{87.78mV}{4.888mV}\$, so let's just say 17. If you want to bring this down to a larger resolution, you can connect the 3.3V from the Arduino's FTDI port to analog reference pin. However, power your voltage divider with the same 5V. In your void setup(), use analogReference(EXTERNAL). What this will do is set up your analog to use the 3.3V reference instead of 5V internal reference.
Now, let's do some more math:
Since we're using 3.3V reference now, the resolution changes to \$\frac{3.3V}{1023} = 3.23mV/\mathsf{step}\$. This will now yield 27.2 steps (\$\frac{87.78mV}{3.23mV}\$) (let's just say 27 steps).
As you can see, we're just improved from 17 steps to 27 steps. In a range of 10C (30C-20C), we can theoretically get a resolution of 10C/27 = 0.37C. I would recommend a capacitor in parallel with the sensor to create a first order low pass filter (allows low frequency through and rejects high frequency after cutoff at a rate of 20dB or 10 times rejection per decade). Wire this capacitor right between A0 and gnd (as close to A0 as possible). Cut off filter is calculated using:
Let's say you're using 1k resistor and 1uF capacitor:
$$f_c = \frac{1}{2\cdot\pi\cdot R\cdot C} = \frac{1}{2\cdot\pi\cdot1000\cdot0.000001} = 159Hz$$
All you have to do now is to play around with the resistor value (it should be bigger than 1k now). Make sure that the worse case scenario will not provide a voltage greater than reference voltage.
I would probably choose a 2k resistor:
\$V_o = 5V\cdot\frac{1922}{1922 + 2000} = 2.450V\$ so analogRead yields 759
\$V_o = 5V\cdot\frac{2080}{2080 + 2000} = 2.549V\$ so analogRead yields 790
Worse case scenario: @150C -> 4280ohms
\$V_o = 5\cdot\frac{4280}{4280+2000} = 3.4V\$ (ok)
Difference 98.73mV -> 98.73mV/3.23mV -> 30 steps
Low pass filter: \$(2\cdot\pi\cdot2000\cdot0.000001)^{-1} = 79.6Hz\$ (AC signal at 796Hz is reduced to 10 times smaller, at 7960Hz is 100 times smaller, etc).
Best Answer
For the high end, you could use a hacked sous vide cooker with a PID controller.
http://hackaday.com/2010/11/06/hacking-together-a-sous-vide-cooker/