From Wikipedia:
The Fermi-Dirac distribution \$F(\epsilon)\$ gives the probability that (at thermodynamic equilibrium) an electron will occupy a state having energy ϵ.
That is, the Fermi-Dirac distribution doesn't give the probability of the existence of an electron at a certain energy. Rather, if there is a state at that energy, it gives the probability of the state being occupied.
So if there are no states, there won't be any electrons regardless of the Fermi level.
A 'perfect dielectric' in this case simply means that we can treat it as an ideal capacitor. We can show using Gauss' law that \$C=\frac{\epsilon_0\epsilon_rS}{d}\$. Recall the relationship \$\epsilon_0\epsilon_r = \epsilon\$ ,
and in particular, the fact that \$\epsilon_r=\frac{C_d}{C_0} \$, where \$C_d
\$ is the capacitance with a vacuum between the plates. This implies that the relative permittivity \$\epsilon_r\$ is the factor by which capacitance changes when a dielectric is added.
Note that knowing only that \$W_e=\frac{CV^2}{2}\$, in combination with the definition of \$\epsilon_r\$, we can arrive at the solution given since the general form for energy stored in a capacitor doesn't change. By a simple discrete mathematical argument, we can safely say that the energy after removing the dielectric is larger. You probably would have arrived at this conclusion had you not misunderstood what a perfect dielectric was. While quick and dirty, this solution doesn't do much for the intuition, so I'll proceed another way.
Consider \$C=\frac{Q}{V}\implies\frac{Q}{C}=V\$; since the cap is essentially an open circuit, the charge cannot change when we remove the dielectric, the assumption here being that the dielectric has no net charge. From this simple observation, we have determined that the change in capacitance brought about by removing the dielectric must cause a change in voltage in this case. Therefore, voltage and electric field are changing. If we decrease the capacitance, the voltage must rise in this case (no battery). If there was a battery, then we could follow similar arguments, except in this case the voltage \$V\$, and hence \$\vec{E}\$ does not change.
Let's put this another way considering the electric field: If we take the electric field \$\vec{E}\$ as \$E=\frac{V}{d}\$, or alternatively that \$E=\frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_0\epsilon_r}\$ , where \$\sigma=\frac{Q}{A}\$, we see again that \$\vec{E}\$ must change because the charge will remain the same while the permittivity \$\epsilon_0\epsilon_r = \epsilon\$ does not. (Again, this is not the case if the battery is still connected.) Ergo, we see an increase in voltage and electric field by removing the dielectric with no battery attached.
So, if we go through the plug and chug knowing the permittivity between the plates affects capacitance, and that the electric field and voltage must change given a constant initial charge, we get that the final energy is actually higher since we've done work on the capacitor.
In short, the energy is higher after the dielectric is removed. Your belief that a perfect dielectric means the \$\epsilon_r=1\$ is not correct I think; rather, 'perfection' in this case simply means that there is no electrical conductivity whatsoever.
Best Answer
The nice clean energy level diagram, with the valence band below, the conduction band above, and the well defined band-gap in the middle, is something of an idealization. It's approximately what you'd get if you had a perfect lattice, and only the exact dopant atoms in a nicely even distribution.
Any number of things are going to fuzz up those clean lines. Mostly impurities will be the culprit. The intended dopant atoms are impurities in the lattice that happen to create energy levels near enough to the conduction band that thermal variations are enough to allow electrons to escape from them into the conduction band (N-type) or settle into them and leave a 'hole' to act as a charge carrier (P-type). However, it's just not possible to prevent other, unwanted impurities from getting in, and these can put energy levels anywhere in the gap. Thermal variations aren't enough to let electrons out of (or into) these kinds of levels, hence the name 'trap'.