I want to use a charge pump to convert 5V to regulated 3.3V output. The charge pump I want to use has the switching frequency of 1200 kHz max. Do I need to be concerned about this switching frequency to avoid EMC issues? How is the EMI from charge pump in comparison to inductor-based regulators?
Electronic – EMI in charge pump switching regulator
charge-pumpemcswitching-regulator
Related Solutions
If you want simple solution, there are lots of ICs named 'high side n-MOS driver' all over the world. Linear Technology, Maxim, Micrel and other manufacturers make them. Just choose what exactly fits your needs.
If you want to konw, how they designed, then... As discrete solution voltage multiplier circuits are commonly used. So you're on right way. Simplest boost circuit i know consists only of capacitor and a diode (shown at left).
simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab
This circuit use Vin voltage when load is off to charge capacitor and then use it to boost gate voltage. Drawback is that capacitor will discharge by leakage currents, so ot need to switch off and on load time-to-time.
So in general boost need independent clock source to pump charge (you're on right way here too). One solution is to use Villard cascade voltage multiplier. Schematic shown at right show charge pump circuit providing gate voltage Vin+V(~f) with single cascade. If higher gate voltage required more cascades can be added.
Note, resistor inserted between pump and controlling circuit, so switching off does not cause complete discharge of capacitors. In industry-made gate drivers push-pull cascade is used, providing very fast switching thus reducing switching power dissipation and reduce quiescent current through pump.
ADD: I found tips in industry made gate drivers:
One end of pump capacitor is feed from MOSFET source, so it is naturally boosted when transistor is switched on. Thus it acts like my left schematic on this thansition.
Another end of pump capacitor is typically fed from LDO. It is need to limit Vgs.
There may be no output capacitor (like C3 on y scheme), thus internal MOSFET capacitance to keep gate voltage while pump capacitor is recharged in steady turned-on state.
Sometimes there's no pushpull output cascade, pump capacitor is discharged when MOSFET is turned off (like on your schematics). This typical to dirvers not designed for PWM applications.
Hundreds of khz is not your biggest problem. You should worry about hundreds of mhz that are involved in switch rise time, boost capacitor charging, etc. It all, by the way, starts with good layout, which if you don't have, is the reason for EMI problems.
There are several simple rules to follow, i hope not to miss something.
- Keep magnetic flux as constant as you can: try making inductor current flow almost same way when the switch is on and off.
- Where you have pulsed current, make sure return parh is right near the line. Of course, the both paths must be very short. Consider ferrite for boost cap to limit bandwidth.
- Prevent capacitive coupling with switching node by removing plane underneath.
2 is most tricky, so pay close attention to whe pulsed currents flow. Use capacitors to provide the pulses, where needed, mostly on switch input.
By the way, you should also use a nice common mode filter on your input to prevent conductive emission.
Good luck!
Best Answer
EMC = Electromagnetic Compatibility. EMI = Electromagnetic Interference.
You can try to make it compatible by using smart PCB layout techniques. But it depends on your goals and final application. New buck converters are smaller, their EMI radiation is smaller as well (EMI is proportional to line length of the components). Most of the EMI you have to worry about is from the charge/discharge in the feedback loop. So, it is very important that you get your layout optimized for reducing it all. For example,
Bottom line, I guess it all matters how much noise/EMI you are willing to accept, and how much you are willing to invest in getting rid of it. As far as Inductor based switches are concered, I used both and aside of the size, I did not notice much difference. I guess in my case it all boiled down to the design.