The inductor starts discharging the voltage across the capacitor. At some point later that voltage is zero but the current is not zero. The energy in the capacitor due to its initial voltage is totally transferred to the inductor in the form of current.
Now we have the reverse situation. That inductor energy starts pumping back into the capacitor and, after the same period of time, the energy is all taken back to the capacitor in the form of a reversed voltage. The cycle repeats.
Go look up the energy equations for a capacitor and inductor and try and visualize this. Also look up the base equations that relate current and voltage to inductors and capacitors respectively.
You can also think of it like a flywheel tethered with an elastic rope. You can turn the flywheel so as to build up tension in the rope. Then let go. The flywheel starts turning the opposite way and at some time later the elastic rope has no tension in it. Because the flywheel has mass it continues spinning but is slowed down by the rope re tensioning. Eventually, the flywheel stops but, because there is energy in the rope the flywheel starts building up speed in the opposite way.
The equations are pretty much the same for this mechanical analogy and the LC circuit.
This is a deeper question than it sounds. Even physicists disagree over the exact meaning of storing energy in a field, or even whether that's a good description of what happens. It doesn't help that magnetic fields are a relativistic effect, and thus inherently weird.
I'm not a solid state physicist, but I'll try to answer your question about electrons. Let's look at this circuit:
simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab
To start with, there's no voltage across or current through the inductor. When the switch closes, current begins to flow. As the current flows, it creates a magnetic field. That takes energy, which comes from the electrons. There are two ways to look at this:
Circuit theory: In an inductor, a changing current creates a voltage across the inductor \$(V = L\frac{di}{dt})\$. Voltage times current is power. Thus, changing an inductor current takes energy.
Physics: A changing magnetic field creates an electric field. This electric field pushes back on the electrons, absorbing energy in the process. Thus, accelerating electrons takes energy, over and above what you'd expect from the electron's inertial mass alone.
Eventually, the current reaches 1 amp and stays there due to the resistor. With a constant current, there's no voltage across the inductor \$(V = L\frac{di}{dt} = 0)\$. With a constant magnetic field, there's no induced electric field.
Now, what if we reduce the voltage source to 0 volts? The electrons lose energy in the resistor and begin to slow down. As they do so, the magnetic field begins to collapse. This again creates an electric field in the inductor, but this time it pushes on the electrons to keep them going, giving them energy. The current finally stops once the magnetic field is gone.
What if we try opening the switch while current is flowing? The electrons all try to stop instantaneously. This causes the magnetic field to collapse all at once, which creates a massive electric field. This field is often big enough to push the electrons out of the metal and across the air gap in the switch, creating a spark. (The energy is finite but the power is very high.)
The back-EMF is the voltage created by the induced electric field when the magnetic field changes.
You might be wondering why this stuff doesn't happen in a resistor or a wire. The answer is that is does -- any current flow is going to produce a magnetic field. However, the inductance of these components is small -- a common estimate is 20 nH/inch for traces on a PCB, for example. This doesn't become a huge issue until you get into the megahertz range, at which point you start having to use special design techniques to minimize inductance.
Best Answer
You said it in your question: "an increase in DC current". Sometimes people get all bundled up in the term "AC". AC describes a special kind of changing current which is sinusoidal. We know pretty much everything there is to know about sinusoids, so describing the nature of AC is pretty easy.
An increase in DC current is still a changing current just like the current changes in an AC signal. The same magnetic effects apply (per your question) when there is any type of change in current. It just so happens that AC is a special type of changing current.
Having said that, describing the true conditions of the inductor and its related fields under arbitrarily changing currents requires more general use of electrodynamics laws.
If you want some more elaboration, please speak up. We'll talk about frequency and the Fourier representation of signals to go in a little deeper.