Electronic – Inductance of planar (spiral) coil near solid copper surface

electromagnetisminductancemutual-inductancephysicstransformer

I'm working on a electromagnetic levitation system, consisting of a flat spiral (planar) inductor positioned above a solid copper surface. The planar coil is parallel to the copper surface. (Consider both the coil and the surface to be 100% pure copper, and the surface infinite in area and depth.)

I know how to calculate the inductance of a spiral inductor in free space. In fact, there are a number of calculators online, like this one.

My question is regarding the change of inductance as the coil is brought near the copper surface. My thinking is to consider the copper surface as a "shorted secondary" in a coreless transformer. This would imply that the inductance of the primary is actually the effective leakage inductance based on the system geometry. I suppose that if the primary (the spiral coil), were brought infinitesimally close to the secondary (copper surface), the leakage inductance would be zero. As the coil is moved away from the copper surface, the leakage inductance would increase (up to the full inductance of the coil in free space, at infinite distance from the copper surface below). I think it is probably ok to consider the resistances as negligible (effectively zero).

I am looking for two things:

  1. Guidance on my thinking, confirmation that I'm on the right track, or correction if not.
  2. A formula that I can apply to calculate [the change in] the coil's inductance as it is positioned at different distances to the copper surface. (Typical distances would be on the order of 1 mm for a 25 mm diameter coil, FWIW.)

I realize that I could actually construct this system in some form and measure the inductance, and perhaps even empirically derive a formula. But I'd rather model it first if possible.

Best Answer

You are correct that the inductance would ideally be zero at zero distance.

You can try to model this from first principles using the Biot-Savart law and a simplified geometry, but I think an FEA approach would be faster and probably more accurate. The parasitics (resistance and distributed capacitance) may turn out to be important, depending on what frequency is used. We're measuring displacement using this method, but in our case resistance is zero and the frequency is DC so it's easier.