A while back i was gathering some ECG data for a colleague at a reasonably high sample rate (around 20kHz – 100Hz is enough for ECG). She came back to me and asked me to regather the data at a lower sample rate – claiming that the high sample rate was introducing extra noise.
Is this plausible, realistic, or based in truth? I can't see how a higher sample rate would make a signal worse – especially considering the data was gathered on an expensive hi-spec oscilloscope
Best Answer
Your college does not seem to remember her statistics lessons. The additional higher frequency noise can be trivially filtered with a low pass filter, and the filtered signal might be better than one sampled at low frequency (oversampling).
Note that using a standard oscilloscope to record live ECG violates patient protection, as medical equipment requires better electrical isolation than those devices usually provide.