If you want a simple solution, you could look for "current sense amplifier" ICs, which are designed specifically for this purpose.
The approach you describe is using the op-amp as a comparator, which is a viable strategy, but it will behave unpredictably when the input voltage difference is around 0V, so somehow you need to introduce an offset in the comparison.
There is a sample current sense circuit in figure 27 of this application note. The quick way to analyze that circuit is to use the rule of thumb that an op-amp in a negative feedback configuration (meaning with a connection from the output back to the \$-\$ terminal) will make the voltages at its inputs equal. I can explain in more detail if it would be useful.
To create a current threshold detector from that circuit, you could add a comparator on \$V_{OUT}\$, or you could remove the \$R_3\$ / \$R_5\$ divider and connect the \$-\$ terminal directly to the low side of the sense resistor \$R_1\$. The \$R_2\$ / \$R_4\$ divider would then set the trip point of the detector.
This is more a set of comments than an answer per se, but too long to fit in a comment.
Signal from oscillators: 8Vpp 1~20KHz with an offset of ~10V with a new 9V battery.
So the issue is how to couple this to another stage which can amplify it, but at the same time set an appropriate input voltage DC offset suitable to the next stage.
The obvious solution would be to use any amplifier design with reasonably high input impedance, and AC couple to it via a capacitor, so for example a cap from OSC1 to R8.
"The main problem is, on Q1 base, where the signals meet, there's no signal." Whatever voltage signal is at Q1 base will be quite small because the impedance at Q1 base will be small compared to the 1 Meg input resistors. (Especially for frequencies above the knee of the R5-C7 highpass filter.)
So the voltages at Q1 base may well be only 1/100 or 1/1000 of the signals into R8 and R9. In any case what you are more concerned with is the AC currents through R8 and R9 (and thence into Q1-base).
And probably also of concern is the DC voltage at Q1-base -- is it in a sensible range to bias Q1 to operate in it's active range, say with 3 to 4 V DC at Q1 collector? Since you have a 100k collector resistor on Q1, that suggests you are expecting a DC Ic of around 0.03mA to 0.04mA, and thus a DC voltage of rather precisely 0.03V-0.04V across R5 (and not, for example, 0.08V), but there's nothing to set a suitable voltage on Q1-base to make that happen so far as I can see.
Finally, what is the role of C9, 10nF? In parallel with R11 that appears to create a filter that will attenuate output above 160Hz or so, working to considerably suppress the signals in your range of interest, 1 kHz-20kHz.
It's difficult to say anything about what you wrote after "My mission: be able to make its output signal usable" because you don't show a schematic of what your did and it's hard to guess.
FWIW, if you feed an AC audio signal via a capacitor into a voltage follower (which has a high impedance input, hence shouldn't disrupt the source of the signal), you are going to get an output voltage that follows the input voltage. That's assuming you've set the DC level at the follower input to something reasonable. There's not much that can go wrong there, so we need to see exactly what you did that might have cause this to fail.
Bottom line, it looks like your challenge here may be simply understanding how amplifiers work (either op amps or with discrete transistors) and how to satisfy their input requirements for signal voltage or current, impedance, and DC bias (aka offset). Perhaps reading up on that topic might allow you to navigate more satisfactorily?
Best Answer
The amplifier CA3130 is NOT unity gain stable. That means: For 100% feedback the unit will oscillate - mostly with amplitudes reachning the power rails. Follow the data sheet recommendations and use a compensation capacitor (>47 pF).