Electronic – Relationship between Transformer Weight and Cooling Method

From ABB's Transformer Handbook, 3e:

3.9 Short Circuit Impedance

Users have sometimes particular requirements regarding the short-circuit impedance. Such requirements may be determined by:

• parallel operation with existing units
• limitation of voltage drop
• limitation of short circuit currents

The transformer designer can meet the requirements in different ways:

• The size of the core cross-section. A large cross-section gives a low impedance, and vice versa.
• A tall transformer gives low impedance and vice versa.

For each transformer there is, however, a smaller range which gives the optimum transformer from an economic point of view, that is the lowest sum of the manufacturing costs and the capital value of the losses.

The 'short circuit impedance' mentioned above is the transformer's percent impedance. The above quote says that the transformer's impedance can be varied by changing the construction of the core.

Note that a transformers' impedance is mostly inductive "leakage reactance", i.e. magnetic impedance. Therefore, the difference between a 1% transformer and a 5% transformer is mostly to do with the design of the transformer's magnetic core. The 1% transformer would require much more iron core than the 5% transformer, and would be physically larger to match, which explains the higher cost.

From J&P Transformer Book, 12e:

In Chapter 1 it was explained that the leakage reactance of a transformer arises from the fact that all the flux produced by one winding does not link the other winding. As would be expected, then, the magnitude of this leakage flux is a function of the geometry and construction of the transformer....

Since reactance is a result of leakage flux, low reactance must be obtained by minimising leakage flux and doing this requires as large a core as possible. Conversely, if high reactance can be tolerated, a smaller core can be provided.

The conductor resistance (i.e. copper winding resistance) is typically small, 1/10th of the total impedance or less. The guideline given in AS3851 is that power transformers of less than 10 MVA may be considered to have X/R = 10.

Not distilled water. You may have heard that Sandia insulate transmission lines with the stuff, but that's for less than 1 second, with ultra-pure, cooled water, so forget it.

Oil, that's mineral or vegatable, will cool the transformer and increase its thermal mass to some extent. Whether it will make enough of a difference to be worth the mess and bother is another matter.

The problem with trying to liquid cool a transformer is that if it has not been built for that, it will not have gaps between the windings so you can get the oil into direct contact with what's getting hot. Indeed, in a transformer built for conduction cooling, there will not only be no channels to get fluid through, but no voids between layers.

An air-blast may be almost as effective, and a lot less messy, than oil.