I have been trying to figure out the "right" way to size pads for surface mount components, and I have found some conflicting wisdom floating around the internets.
Lets say I have this hypothetical part that requires two square pads, the centers of which are 15 units apart, and the edge that are 5 units on edge.
This SO post suggests that I should have my copper be the exact size of the pads, and the mask be slightly oversize to account for shrinkage and/or misalignment. This seems somewhat reasonable, as relative shift/shrink/misalignment can be tolerated. Under this scenario I might want the the masks to be 6×6 holes with the same center-to-center spacing as the underlying copper.
Conversley, in a different scenario if you were to oversize the copper to 6×6, you would gain the same tolerance to misalignment,and additionally some extra adhesion holding the pads down. This approach is suggested in some BGA/QFN packages I have been looking at. (Example 1) (Example 2) (Example 3)
I realize that there isn't really a "Correct" answer, but what motivates one arrangement verses the other?
Best Answer
Different sources give conflicting advices because they refer to different needs. You need three sizes to take care of: the copper area, the solder mask and the paste mask. Their sizes are usually determined by:
This list is most probably incomplete, but it should give you an idea of what values you need to take care of in your particular project.