Start out by removing the series RC 33K/10nF.
The remaining 10nF ensures the DC gain is ONE.
The 100pF ensures the very high frequency gain also is ONE.
The 100pF in parallel with 10 Kohm is 1uS tau, or 160KHz F3dB.
The 100pF in parallel with (10K + 100K) is 11uS tau, or 14 KHz F3dB.
Now add back in R5 (33K) and C3 (10nF); Tau is 3.3e4 * 1e-8 = 3.3e-4 => radian frequency of 3KHz, F3dB of 500Hz (2 octaves above middle C).
R5 and C3 being parallel with R6, provides 4dB boost in gain above 500Hz.
What is the gain? The minimum gain is set as 1 + 10K/27K or 1.4 or 3dB.
The maximum gain is set as 1 + 110K/27K = 5 (14dB)
And do not forget about the boost in gain, from R5+C3
Feeding back speed is the same as feeding back the rate of change of distance against time so your question really boils down to why you might use a proportional feedback signal as well as a differential signal.
Simple answer is that when used properly, the speed signal fed back can reduce the rate at which the system homes in on the target position and somewhat reduces the effect of overshoot and hunting. In other words, it’s a stabilising factor in the presence of system inertia.
Maybe do some research on three term controllers or PID controllers. P stands for proportional, I for integral and D for differential. Differential is the same effect as a speed signal in a position control system.
why waste the expense of a speed sensor, extra circuitry when you can
just increase the P gain in the position loop PID controller to
accomplish the same
Try this out: -
Picture License information
Best Answer
This is an example that appears in the first chapter of the excellent book Feedback Control of Dynamic Systems, from Prof. Gene F. Franklin. The percent error on output is defined as:
$$ \%error = 100 \times\frac{(Y_{cl}\space when\space w=0)-(Y_{cl}\space when\space w\neq0)}{(Y_{cl}\space when\space w=0)}$$
Note that \$(Y_{cl}\space when\space w=0) = \frac{100}{101}\times r\$
Do the math.