Where can one find the standard specification for regular alkaline AAA, AA, C and D batteries? I mean, I know that different suppliers must have different battery capacity/property but there must be some standard that regulates this market. Eg.: maximum allowed current, minimum energy capacity, etc.
Electronic – Standard/Specification for regular alkaline batteries
alkalinebatteries
Related Solutions
An equation/model that described the effects of time, current, temperature, etc. on battery voltage would be very useful. It would be even better if a microcontroller could use that model to deduce/estimate the internal state of the battery -- in particular, the state of charge (SoC) and the depth of discharge (DoD). Ideally by watching a battery as it is normally being used, but perhaps probing the battery with occasional brief pulses of positive and negative current would be informative.
My understanding is that many people approximate a battery as some internal voltage source in series with the battery internal resistance (or a more complex RC network). Rather than try to find an equation that directly gives the output voltage of the battery given the instantaneous internal battery state and the instantaneous current pulled from it, they assume the internal voltage source stays fixed (for a given kind of battery chemistry) and find some equation that slowly adjusts the internal resistance of the battery -- close to zero when the battery is fully charged, and slowly increasing resistance as the battery discharges. (Other rapid-transient effects are modeled by fixed capacitors and fixed resistors in the RC network).
- Jonathan Johansen. "Mathematical modelling of Primary Alkaline Batteries". gives curves that very closely match your first curve, and a explanation in terms of the internal chemistry. (Can you tell I prefer such "Babylonian" explanations?)
- Mathworks. generic battery model. Uses a fixed internal resistance and a complex equation to describe the internal voltage. This gives a curve that very closely matches your first curve. Alas, to me it looks like the kind of Euclidean equations that give more-or-less the right answers, but don't help me understand what's really going on.
- Min Chen, and Gabriel A. Rincon-Mora. "Accurate Electrical Battery Model Capable of Predicting Runtime and I–V Performance"
- M.R. Jongerden and B.R. Haverkort. "Battery Modeling".
- Wikipedia: Peukert's law. Peukert's law is an equation that estimates the run-time -- from fully charged to fully drained -- from 4 other parameters, including a Peukert exponent.
- Guoliang Wu, Rengui Lu, Chunbo Zhu, and C. C. Chan. "Apply a Piece-wise Peukert’s Equation with Temperature Correction Factor to NiMH Battery State of Charge Estimation". Guoliang Wu et. al. show one way to adjust the Peukert exponent to compensate for temperature. So we're up to 5 values. Alas, my understanding is that both Peukert's law and Guoliang's improvement are purely empirical fits to a bunch of data -- it doesn't explain why the run-time varies in that way. They only gives one point on your graph -- the time when your graph crosses the manufacturer's full discharge voltage -- roughly 0.8 V for alkaline batteries.
- Ralph Hiesey. "Some comments on “Peukert’s” compensation—why we don’t use it".
- Ahmed Fasih. "Modeling and Fault Diagnosis of Automotive Lead-Acid Batteries".
- Mikäel G. Cugneta, Matthieu Dubarrya and Bor Yann Liawa "Peukert's Law of a Lead-Acid Battery Simulated by a Mathematical Model".
- Quan-Chao Zhuang et. al. "Diagnosis of Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy in Lithium-Ion Batteries" p. 192 shows a model of a battery composed of a bunch of resistors and capacitors.
- Duracell MN1500 AA datasheet has a nice graph of resistance versus depth of discharge. All Duracell datasheets, in case the link changes.
I hear that one manufacturer uses a state-of-charge model of a battery with 408 different values. Is there a better model?
It sounds like you may have a handle on your question already, but I would like to add a couple of points about NIMH vs Alkaline.
You don't say how many watts or how many amps or milliamps your megaphone will be demanding, but the NiMH have a much lower internal resistance and so they can provide a much higher current without dropping their voltage as much as an Alkaline will. At higher loads, a Nimh will provide more power than a Alkaline; at very low loads, an Alkaline will provide more power (a very very loose generalization, but for example, an Alkaline will last forever in a remote control while the NiMH will not last as long - of course there is also the self discharge of many of the NiMH).
Also, most NiMH have a NOMINAL volatage of 1.2, but fully charged they start out at closer to 1.4 (I have measured some NiMH fully charged at 1.5) volts, and as mentioned already, hold to the 1.2 volts for most of their discharge.
The Alkalines often start closer to 1.6 volts, but quickly lose voltage as they discharge so that their average voltage through their life is about 1.2 Volts! Of course this depends on what the cut off voltage of your Megaphone is.
Don't forget that most NiMH have a very high self discharge rate and can lose 10-20% of their capacity in the first day, and 1% of their capacity per day just sitting there and are essentially completely discharged in 3 months or less! There are newer NiMH that hold 85% of their capacity over a year.
Check out http://batteryuniversity.com/learn/article/Nickel_based_batteries for more info.
As far as your 4 options, option 2 sounds like the best one. Options 3 and 4 have been discussed by others as to why they offer such poor performance.
Best Answer
The international standard is IEC 60086, specifically:
IEC 60086-2:2015 - Primary batteries - Part 2: Physical and electrical specifications
(current cost is CHF 250)
Abstract: IEC 60086-2:2015 is applicable to primary batteries based on standardized electrochemical systems. It specifies the physical dimensions, the discharge test conditions and discharge performance requirements. [...]
Examples of IEC battery type designations include:
Other IEC battery designations are given in the Wikipedia article on battery sizes.
(I believe there is an ANSI-equivalent to this IEC standard, but I haven't used it.)