Writing nodal equation at ground node,
$$-7 =\frac{V_1}{10} + \frac{V_2}{5} + \frac{V_2}{2}$$
$$or,\ \mathbf{0.1V_1 + 0.7V_2 = -7}$$
Writing nodal equation at \$V_1\$ correctly will also produce the same equation. You actually missed the term \$0.7V_2\$ in it.
Now,
$$V_2 = V_1+6I_x$$
but, $$I_x = -0.1V_1$$
then,
$$V_2 = 0.4V_1$$
$$\mathbf{0.4V_1 - V_2 = 0}$$
Writing these equations in matrix format,
$$
\left[ \begin{array}{cc}
0.4 & -1 \\
0.1 & 0.7\end{array} \right]\left[ \begin{array}{c}
V_1 \\
V_2\end{array} \right]=\left[ \begin{array}{c}
0 \\
-7\end{array} \right]
$$
I am getting an extra -1. Correct me if I am wrong.
You are on the right track but your solution to the differential equation is not quite right. I solved it using Wolfram Alpha and this is what I get:
$$v_c(t)=\frac{R_2V}{R_1+R_2}-\frac{R_2V}{R_1+R_2}e^{-\frac{R_1+R_2}{CR_1R_2}t} $$
Or
$$v_c(t)=\frac{R_2V}{R_1+R_2}\bigg(1-e^{-\dfrac{t}{\tau}}\bigg) $$
*Where \$V\$ is the voltage from the source (94V).
Which makes sense because when \$t\rightarrow\infty\$ (capacitor is charged) all you have is a voltage divider formed by the two resistors.
Since when the step voltage is applied, the capacitor is a short, \$R_2\$ gets shorted out and all the the current has to flow through \$R_1\$ at that instant. That's why you are given \$i_{R_1}(0^+)\$. Then
$$ R_1 =\frac{V}{i_{R_1}(0^+)}$$
Where \$V\$ is the voltage from the source (94V). (@Transistor answered this in his answer)
You are also given the power on \$R_2\$ when steady state. You got this one right.
Now, in order to find \$C\$, it would be helpful to use the time constant \$\tau\$, which is the time it takes the capacitor to reach 63.2% of its final value.
$$ \tau=\frac{CR_1R_2}{R_1+R_2}$$
And
$$ C=\bigg(\frac{R_1+R_2}{R_1R_2}\bigg)\tau$$
You already have the values for \$R_1\$ and \$R_2\$, and the only unknown is \$\tau\$. From the original question I can't see anything that would force \$C\$ to be a specific value, that is, there is no given constraint on the time constant, other than \$\tau>0\$ so that the problem is nontrivial. No constraint for \$\tau\$ means no constraint for \$C\$. So any value of \$C\$ does the job.
Edit:
Answering the OP question in from the comments.
If you let \$t=\tau\$ then you should get a value for \$v_c(t)\$ equal to 63.2% of it final value. So at \$t=\tau\$:
$$ v_c(\tau)=\frac{R_2V}{R_1+R_2}(1-e^{-1})$$
Or
$$ v_c(\tau)=\frac{R_2V}{R_1+R_2}(0.632)$$
Whatever that gives you won't help you in finding a value for \$C\$. As you can see when you let \$t=\tau\$, the \$C\$ term isn't there anymore (it's embedded in \$\tau\$) so can't solve for \$C\$ from there.
The only place to solve for \$C\$ is in the \$\tau\$ equation.
Best Answer
The inductor equation: $$L i_3'=v_1-v_C$$
The capacitor equation: $$c v_c'=i_3\ \ \ (1)$$
Kirchoff's current law: $$\frac{u-v_1}{R_1}=i_3+\frac{v_1}{R_2}$$
which can be solved for \$v_1\$ to get $$v_1=\frac{R_2 \left(u-i_3 R_1\right)}{R_1+R_2}$$
Substitute this in the inductor equation $$L i_3'=\frac{R_2 \left(u-i_3 R_1\right)}{R_1+R_2}-v_c \ (2)$$
The equations (2) and (1) can then be put in matrix form as
$$\left( \begin{array}{c} i_3' \\ v_c' \\ \end{array} \right)=\left( \begin{array}{cc} -\frac{R_1 R_2}{L \left(R_1+R_2\right)} & -\frac{1}{L} \\ \frac{1}{c} & 0 \\ \end{array} \right).\left( \begin{array}{c} i_3 \\ v_c \\ \end{array} \right)+ \left( \begin{array}{c} \frac{R_2}{L \left(R_1+R_2\right)} \\ 0 \\ \end{array} \right) u$$
Verifying using Mathematica.