Electronic – the maximum voltage that silicon can handle

high voltagemainspowerpower supplyswitch-mode-power-supply

Today, in a race for efficiency, we have moved from transformers to switching power supplies. Almost all PSUs were designed for single-phase low-voltage operation (220Vac/310Vdc in my country). I've never ever seen 380V 3-phase 3+ kW ATX PSUs for PCs despite their efficiency and lower ripple noise. They would be very useful for stacks of GPUs. I think that it is mainly because electrolytic capacitors cannot survive rectified 660Vdc.

And it could be even better to rectify a 10kV medium voltage line, as it usually comes to the village transformer. But what is the voltage limit silicon devices (MOSFETs) can survive without breaking down?

Best Answer

You can get 8 kV rated (at several thousand amps) thyristors for use in HVDC converters. The gate is optically coupled for the obvious reasons and also because, when used in tandem on HVDC links, the gate driving speed differences between series connected thyristors is important and optical is a little bit more clear cut speed-wise: -

enter image description here

Stack a few together in a tray with the various extras you need to control them safely (snubbers etc) and you get one of these: -

enter image description here

Then you build a monument to the gods of Megavolt by stacking the trays like so: -

enter image description here

Notice the little guy at the bottom.

Regarding power I've read that it takes 40 grams of silicon to control 20 MW of power and a lot of these installations are literally a thousand MW or more.

And it could be even better to rectify 10kV medium voltage line, as it usually come to village transformer.

Ah but you don't get safe isolation that is reliable - one breakdown and 10 kV in your house wiring is not good. Plus, the break-even point on a HVDC link versus a regular AC link is many, many miles.

Where are 3-phase 380v to 12V PSUs?

Well there is a technical snag that is inherent to the circuit used for many years in the "standard" 3 phase rectifier circuit: -

enter image description here

The problem is how they switch and power factor correction. In the good old days nobody cared but these days PF and supply cleanliness is paramount in many countries. And this is the problem with the standard 3 phase rectifier - it cannot be PF corrected because diodes can't conduct from 0 volts through to 0 volts (throughout one-half cycle) because of the blocking effect of the other phases and their diodes. The pulsing current taken from the 3 phase supply is really bad.

The solution is to use three single phase (and PF corrected) supplies all contributing power to a common DC bus. So, the modern 3 phase switching supply is in fact three single phase supplies.

How do the HVDC thyristors do it you might ask? They use filters as big as small houses to quench the harmonics generated.

enter image description here

Notice the relative size of the harmonic filters compared to the "valve hall" where all the thyristor "valves" are. All manner of double and single tuned filters are used just to remove those harmonics and, if the same technique were used on more ordinary standard 3 phase switching supplies (the ones that will never meet modern legislation) then guess what; the cost of the filtering is more than the added cost of individual supplies with PF correction built in.

Could you provide a link to model name, or at least name the product series?

Infineon thyristor discs rated at up to 8 kV and 4800 amps.