dc/dc convertertopologytransformer
I have found this weird DC-DC converter topology in datasheet of MC34063 from ST.
The primary charging is single ended, so at first it seems like flyback, but it has four diodes on the output instead of only two. Is this some forward or flyback hybrid? What is it called? Or is there a mistake in the datasheet?
Making a 500V supply capable of a few uA is actually pretty trivial:
The transformer can be any generic 1:1 isolation transformer, the phone isolation transformers you can buy at radioshack work quite well.
However, this power supply is not capable of supplying any real power. It works great for a geiger-counter, but if you have a load smaller then ~\$50M\Omega\$, you will begin to overload it.
There is no hard limit to the output power from a flyback topology. It's a matter of which is best for a given situation. One could create a 1kW flyback, but it would not likely be economical. This is a business where they have blood-on-the-carpet meetings over 3-cent diodes and recognize that it is cheaper to hire another full-time engineer than to put an extra few pennies of cost into their product- so not picking the best topology for the requirements could foreshorten one's career.
The flyback converter uses the core less efficiently (means more money, size and weight for a core, which matters more as power levels go up). As Russell points out, the flyback stores the transferred energy in the inductor, and releases it to the output, as opposed to most other types that transfer energy when the switch is on. That means necessarily the current stress must be higher, since all the energy is being transferred by a single switch, and it can only be on a part of the time. (Keep in mind that some losses are proportional to the square of the current, so 10A for 33% of the time vs. 3A for 100% of the time represent the same load power, but the resistive losses in the low duty cycle switch are 3.7 times higher.
The voltage stress on the switch in a flyback is far higher (double input voltage) compared to a two-switch forward converter (just the input voltage). This makes the switch more expensive, especially for MOSFETs, where chip size (and therefore cost) rapidly rises with voltage rating, all other things being equal. Switches that are less sensitive to voltage (in cost) tend to be rather slow (BJTs and IGBTs), so again less suitable for flyback converters because they would require a bigger core.
Flyback converters have a number of advantages (potential simplicity because of the single switch, no output inductors required because the leakage inductance works for you, wide input voltage range), but those advantages mostly dominate at lower power levels.
That's why you'll almost always see flyback converters used in AC adapters, and you'll never see it in a 250W+ PC power supply-- both applications where any excess cost that is safe to squeeze out has been squeezed out (sometimes more that that!).
Best Answer
It is a flyback.
Don't let the number of diodes confuse you here - that bridge rectifier is just necessary because the circuit strives to do full-wave rectification.
A flyback converter's transformer secondary is in principle isolated from the primary, so the output differential voltage can be referenced to any voltage.