I am trying to replace a rotary absolute optical encoder (single turn). The resolution of the encoder is 13 bits (8191). The reason for the replacement is to reduce the cost.
My approach is to get a single-turn (electrically) infinite turn (mechanically) precision potentiometer. Use a 16-bit ADC (neglect the last three bits due to noise).
Questions:
- Type of sensor element: As I have read, conductive plastic is the best for such an application. Am I right?
- Linearity: The least I found was 0.15% for a wirewound potentiometer (which I do not know how much error in degrees it has and how it will affect my result)
- Electrical travel: most potentiometer's electrical travel is a bit under 360 degrees (320 to 358). For example: beisensors. So in the last 2 degrees will the system be blind and does not know where it is? Is this common? Does it have a solution?
Please correct my information if I am wrong. Do you think these problems are limiting factors in potentiometers, and they cannot be used to the specific task that I need?
Best Answer
All poteniometers are < 360° because there has to be a gap between the ends of the resistance track. You would need two pots ganged onto the same shaft 180° out of phase.
You got me interested, however, and a search for "360 degree angle sensor potentiometer" threw up some interesting products from Novatechnik. See rotary shaft type and the AW360-ZE where they seem to have this figured out.
Figure 1. Extract from the AW360-ZE datasheet.
Their "potentiometer" takes a Uref reference signal and gives a DC output proportional to Uref x angle.
They don't go into specifics of how they work but here are my thoughts:
simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab
Figure 2. (a) A possible method of fabrication. A circular resistance track with connections at 0° and 180° would give a triangle wave output when rotating continuously in one direction. By adding 4-quadrant opto-detection it would be possible to figure out which quadrant the wiper is in and use that in the Logik circuit. (b) gives what might be a more reliable method. By simultaneously switching SW1 and SW2 they could use one switch position to get an actual voltage reading and the other to determine the quadrant.