I have procured some supercaps.
No datasheet was provided. The only data I have is what is printed on the caps themselves: "4.0F 5.5V cda®
"
Since my DMMs don't measure capacitance in Farads, I setup the following circuit shown below. Two "10Ω 1% 2W
" (20.2Ω and 20.3Ω measured
) caps in series with the cap.
simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab
Note that I did not actually use a switch, I simply connected a banana plug. I did that to avoid extra variables (switch resistance and power rating, as well as power supply startup time).
That being said, with a large expected time period of 80+ seconds, I figured that using a stopwatch and monitoring my DMM would suffice.
The RC time constant is: R*C = (20.3Ω)*(4) = 80.2 seconds
Which I take to mean that if I apply 5V
as shown in the circuit and close SW1, the cap should reach 5V * 0.632 = 3.16V
at 80.2 seconds
. The current limit on the supply was set to 2A (more than enough).
The cap went from 0V
to 3.16V
in approximately 38 seconds
, at which point I removed the cap from the circuit.
Solving for capacity: C = (38 seconds)/(20.3Ω) = 1.87 F
, only 47%
of the 4F
labeled!
About a minute after being removed from the circuit, the voltage on the cap had stabilized at about 1.28V
. Should I be using this value instead? That would suggest 6.43F
, so I'm guessing "No".
I then tried the same test with another cap of the same specs… same result.
I next tried a discharge test, going from 4.8V
to 1.64V
. That should have taken 87 seconds
, but instead took only 28 seconds
, hinting at a capacity of only 1.27F
.
However, by leaving the cap to discharge for 55 seconds
showed 1.1V
, suggesting a capacity of 1.82F
. That's odd to me because it means that it's not following the predicted curve. And that would mean that I will end up calculating a different capacity depending on the time I record at. But that shouldn't be.
The following image is from hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu:
I'm wondering what margin of error I should expect from a test like this. Assuming my multimeter is calibrated beyond practically needed, and that recorded times are valid, is it possible that the capacitance is closer to 4F
?
Best Answer
"Simple" Solution to get close to Maxwell 6 step method.
Use Ic = C/10 [A] or Ic=CdV/dt or dV/dt= 0.1 V/s test slew rate with 3 Ohms approx for duration after charging for one hour and discharge to 50% for the test.
simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab Simulation of above with estimated values, not actual to show lag effects.
Activation of the absorption layer is a key pre-requisite to this test.
opinion
Somewhat like batteries which have a useful range from Vi to Vf, "Double-layer Effect" Supercaps must be charged near full Voltage for a sustained time and full energy stored is obtained by this process. It is not a 100% efficient process, but unlike batteries can be repeated a million cycles within the C/10 current range.
Therefore to get maximum useful energy storage time ought to be in a similar manner as batteries from full to 50% initial voltage. Otherwise the C value is effectively reduced.
simulate this circuit
This is a suggestive approach to problem solving not a complete answer.
The correct method is to use the same method used in the datasheet with guaranteed values.
C2 is often called Dielectric Absorption or the "Double-layer Capacitor".
Maxwell's documented test method.
Using dV/dt=Ic/C for Ic=C/10 with I [A] and C in [F]
Suggested test method to follow Maxwell's approach.
Follow 6 Step Process
Step 1 Safely Discharge Vc to 0V
Below for Step 2,3,4 of 1st cycle
Below for Step 5,6 of 1st cycle.