Electronic – Why do receivers have a choke but transmitters don’t

chokeradioreceiverRFtransmitter

Here's a receiver I found on the web:

Receiver

And here's a transmitter:

[Transmitter[2]

Why do receivers have an inductor specifically designated as a choke (RFC) in their circuits but transmitters don't?

Best Answer

The purpose of a Radio Frequency Choke is to 'choke' ie. restrict radio frequencies from getting into parts of the circuit where they are not wanted. It does this by making use of the property of inductance, which causes the choke's impedance to increase as the frequency increases.

RFC's are not restricted to receivers (transmitters often have them too) and not all receivers use them. Whether an RFC is necessary depends on the particular circuit configuration and how the designer decided to implement it.

The RFC in your superregenerative receveiver actually has two jobs. As well as stopping RF from getting into the audio amplifier, it also raises the impedance at the Emitter of Q1, so the signal from the antenna won't be shorted to Ground by the 0.001uF capacitor (that capacitor is required to remove the ultrasonic quench frequency which is used to maintain superregeneration).

Your example FM transmitter does not need an RFC because audio is fed into the Base of Q1, which does not have any RF on it (ensured by C8, which shorts any RF present to Ground). L1 could be considered to be an RFC, except that in this case it forms a tuned circuit in combination with VC1, C9 and C7.

However, many transmitters instead use a Pi filter between the output transistor and the antenna, and therefore do require an RFC to stop the RF signal from being shorted out by the power supply. Here is an example:-

enter image description here