Transformer Coupling – Why Transformer Coupling Is Used in Simple Slope Detectors
demodulationdetectionfmRFtransformer
This is what I mean by simple slope detector:
Why can't it be like:
Best Answer
Why is transformer coupling used in a simple slope detector?
You don't need a transformer for a simple slope detector. This circuit would work providing you select the centre frequency to be one side of the LC tank resonant frequency: -
So I've done some research since I have a similar problem and everything leads me to fully integrated quadrature demodulators like LT5517 with a good NCO if you need AFC. All digital systems with direct sampling might have even better noise performance especially if you use oversampling (source) but they have a detection delay, so your application should tolerate this delay if you want to use this method. Search for FPGA or DSP FM demodulators, there are plenty of articles.
The best solution for data transmission I've found so far are specialized transceivers with interference resistance like AD9364, but those come in 144-LFBGA and cost $210 per chip. See this article for more info.
If you need a simple and decent demodulator, conventional quadrature demodulator has the best noise performance if you use high quality parts for it.
If you are still confused -63dBm is a power level of 501.2 pico watts and -2dBm is a power of 631 micro watts. I think you should be able to convert these to voltages by now.
Best Answer
You don't need a transformer for a simple slope detector. This circuit would work providing you select the centre frequency to be one side of the LC tank resonant frequency: -
Or maybe this diagram from an Analog devices article: -