Besides the reason that electron mobility is higher than hole mobility, what are the other reasons of preferring an N-channel over a P-channel MOSFET?
Electronic – Why N-channel MOSFETs are better than P-channel MOSFETs
constant-currentintegrated-circuitmosfettransistorsvoltage-regulator
Related Topic
- Electronic – Is it ok for Vgs be higher than Vds on a n-channel mosfet
- Electronic – Why pulsed drain current is higher than continuous drain current in MOSFETs
- Electronic – Are MOSFETs better for high power applications than the BJT
- Electrical – Power ORing using P-Channel MOSFETs
- Electronic – Why are n-channel MOSFETs at high-side position and p-channel MOSFETs at low-side position on many push-pull circuits
Best Answer
Since you haven't specified I will choose my domain of answer: chip design.
The answer really depends ... NMOS is not always better than PMOS in all areas.
Carrier mobility:
most modern CMOS processes are on <100> crystal orientation wafers. In this system since the transistors are in a common substrate there will be a ~ 2.2X factor in mobility between electrons and holes.
processes around the 65nm node started using stress/strain to more closely match the mobility between the two type of transistors, mainly for size savings. Intel is a prime example of this approach.
Substrate connection:
Noise:
PMOS transistors at process nodes above 0.35u were typically buried channel devices (due to process techniques used at those nodes). these devices had much lower noise than NMOS transistors in the same process node. Simply because the channel was kept away form the Si/SiO2 interface states at the Si - Gate Oxide boundary. This is particularly true of flicker noise.
PMOS transistors below 0.25u mostly were surface channel devices and as a result they picked up NTBI (Negative Temperature Bias Instability) noise like characteristics.
Process variability: