Oscilllator model in multisim

Multisim does have ideal opamps, they can be found in the master database under Analog>Analog_Virtual_OPAMP_3T_VIRTUAL, but as Kortuk said, you should strongly consider using an opamp that forces you to include a power supply.

If you have a particular opamp that you know you will be using in a lab, you should see if you can find it in the multisim database. Multisim has very good models for how the opamps will actually act even more then just how you are powering them.

As for your question about Vin and Vout, in Multisim you can go to Simulate>Instruments and select what ever instrument you want to place. So you could put a function generator in for Vin and a Oscope for Vout.

It's not the same circuit on the emitter. You've got a 1k pot in series with a 1k resistor and the pot wiper connects to a grounding capacitor. You've also got a 10pF cap where it is 100nF in LTSpice.

I'm not saying any of these matter but you can't possibly make comparisons with these glaring disparities.

EDIT

Following comments from the OP, the problem I think arises from the new "intended" operating frequency of the circuit (he uses a 10pF cap on the multisim circuit to set the resonant frequency whilst the LTSpice circuit has 100nF). Added to this is the lack of emitter capacitor - the multisim circuit shows it connected via the wiper of a pot set midway and this will drastically reduce the gain and prevent or delay oscillation. Remember that the collector has to generate enough signal to drive the 10nF capacitor (C3) and at a much higher frequency this 10nF (via C5, 1uF) will probably look like a short circuit - the gain of the transistor has to be greater than 1 for it to begin oscillation and with no directly connected emitter capacitor and a 10nF effectively connected to the collector I think the gain will be less than unity.

I'm not totally familiar with this type of Colpitts oscillator but it seems to me that the LTSpice circuit should oscillate at about 41kHz whereas the MS circuit should operate at about 4.1MHz - this isn't going to happen with a 10pF - its reactance at 4.1MHz will be nearly 4 kohms and this will get "battered" by R1 and R2 in the imedance versus resistance race. Do the sensible thing and start with the same circuit. On the LT circuit, the 100nF will have an impedance of about 40 ohms at 41kHz and therefore not be hardly affected by R1 and R2.