SNR vs Signal Strength for digital throughput

antennadigital-communicationssignalsnrwifi

I'm trying to compare two antennas, A and B for WiFi.

A is showing: Signal Strength of -77dBm, but SNR of 9dB.

B is showing: Signal Strength of -85dBm, but SNR of 24dB.

My understanding is as follows – but I'm no expert on the matter:
Better signal means I'll be able to receive data further away from the source, but better SNR means that signal will have a higher throughput (because less packets are being corrupted).

Does this make sense? And is there some equation to use both of these measures to form a single comparable number for digital throughput?

Best Answer

"Signal Strength": I believe you are referring to the RSSI value, which is the Received Signal Strength Indicator this value is typically shown as a negative dBm value. RSSI is the measurement of power in an RF signal, the more power in an RF signal the better the connection quality is. It’s typically best practice to have the SNR value 20 to 25 dB’s away from the RSSI value. Please see the figure below, where it's also taken into account the Noise Level (-50 - (-96) = +46):

RSSI - SNR