When to Consider Cable Capacitance in RF Transmission Lines

coaxialRFtransmission line

When feeding an RF signal to a coaxial transmission line, when do you have to take into consideration the capacitance of the cable? I am working with a 36 MHz signal. The total cable length is ~3 ft (RG316 with SMA connectors).

The source and load impedances are not equal. The source impedance is -130\$j \Omega\$ and the load impedance is 1 k\$\Omega\$.

I want to make sure I am calculating the transfer function correctly.

Best Answer

50 ohm air spaced cable has a capacitance of 66.7pF/m, dielectric spaced cables with velocity factors around 0.66 have around 100pF/m. This is a useful number, every time you connect two items together in the lab with a typical 1m coax cable, at low frequencies it is like adding 100pF across the signal. A 2m cable is like 200pF.

\$C=\frac{1}{Z_0 v}\$ where \$v=\frac{c}{\sqrt{\epsilon_r}}\$ is the velocity of propagation

As your 1m cable is around 20% of a wavelength at 36MHz you should really treat it as a transmission line.

Just looking at the capacitance, at low frequencies it looks like about 100pF, which at 36MHz has a reactance of about 44ohms. It is clearly going to influence your circuit where your impedance is around 1k.

Assuming that you are after the simple voltage transfer function from a source with 130k impedance to the 1k load, with no cable you have -42.3dB. Treating the cable as a simple 100pF shunt gives -69.4dB, treating it as a 5ns length of 50 ohm cable gives -67.4dB (from a simple SPICE sim).

Assuming that you are after the simple voltage transfer function from a source with -130j impedance (= 34pF cap at 36MHz) to the 1k load, with no cable you have -0.1dB. Treating the cable as a simple 100pF shunt gives -11.9dB, treating it as a 5ns length of 50 ohm cable gives -8.9dB (from a simple SPICE sim). Note that this can change quite dramatically with the length of the cable, use a 2m cable and you get -2.8dB, increasing your signal by over 6dB.