Preparing for CCNP, doing some lab work. ZEUS is summarizing two loopbacks with area 2 range 172.16.2.0 255.255.254.0
, and the summary route is arriving on router 'WODAN' but the subordinate routes (2 /32's) are also still showing up in WODAN's ip routing table. Why? My understanding was that once the summarization occurred that the normal T3 LSA's would not be sent, instead a summary T3 would be sent by the ABR (zeus in this case)? I can't understand why I still see /32's if the summary is received on WODAN.
Here are the topology and relevant command outputs for the two routers in question.
Best Answer
The short answer is because ZEUS (which is summarizing) is summarizing for Area 2, but it also shares Area 2 with WODAN. OSPF requires all routers in an area to have the same exact copy of the area's link-state database; OSPF ABRs run a separate SPF algorithm calculation for each area they participate in.
Quoting RFC 2328 - Open Shortest Path First:
You can verify this with:
I mocked that output up from experience, but I expect you to see:
Since 172.16.2.2 still exists in the OSPF LSDB, OSPF installs a route for it. Note that there is a difference between 172.16.2.2/32 and 172.16.2.0/23 in the output of
show ip route
:O IA
route (IA
means Inter-Area, generated by a Type 3 Network Summary LSA)O
route, if there are no letters following theO
, then the route comes from a Router LSA, also called Type 1 LSAA final side note that you didn't explicitly mention... you configured ZEUS' Loopbacks with 24-bit masks; however, due to the way OSPF handles loopbacks, those loopbacks are advertised as host routes.