CISCO Wireless Lan Controller and AP’s design question

ciscowirelesswlc

There are a couple of questions on design solution.

  1. CAPWAP tunnel is created between the controller and the access points. The ends of the tunnel are the controller's "ap-management" interface and management interface of access point. I've discovered that having the AP and Controller in different L2 domains is best practice, but in theory this seems like a better solution. Which is correct?

  2. One of the wireless networks will be the guest WI-FI. A secretary will create access attributes. Is it require to create an additional interface (in corporate network) on the controller and give credentials to "Lobby Admin" to implement such a scheme?

Best Answer

  1. Putting the APs and the controller in the same L2 domain is the simplest solution as you don't have to do anything else for them to find one another. If you put the APs on a different subnet then you have to either configure DHCP option 43 on the APs subnet or put in a DNS entry for cisco-capwap-controller.DOMAIN-APs-GET-FROM.DHC. Formerly this was cisco-lwapp-controller.

  2. You'll need to give the secretary either admin or lobby admin access to the WLC so that they can create the logins. It doesn't need an additional interface for guest wifi but you can use one and plug it into the DMZ for better isolation.

Edit: Corrected DHCP option number as @generalnetworkerror pointed out my faulty memory.