Ethernet – Why Repeaters Are Needed Despite Bridges or Switches

bridgeethernet

I was reading the HowStuffWorks article on ethernet. From the article, I understand that bridges are just like repeaters, but with the added benefit of not cluttering up other collision domains.

So I understand that we can use a bridge wherever we can use a repeater. My questions is, if that's the case, why do repeaters still exist?

Does it have to do with:

1) Bridges cost more than repeaters?

2) Bridges introduce a higher overhead?

Best Answer

I would argue that repeaters hardly do exist today.

A repeater amplifies the electric signal but is a completely analogue device and does not in any way interpret the signal. A repeater is the same thing as a 2-port hub although I've seen some companies starting to use the term repeater for equipment that resembles a switch more than a hub.

Contrast this with a switch that receives a frame, interprets it and extracts the destination MAC address which it then acts upon to forward the frame to it's correct destination. A bridge is the same thing as a 2-port switch.

Due to the low cost of switches and their support for higher speeds, the market for hubs/repeaters is slim to none.

Related Topic