I don't have SUP7 to test, but it works on SUP6 and SUP32, I would presume SUP7 retains this functionality.
I've tested between JNPR M320 <-> SUP32, and 'vlan mapping JNPR SUP32' works just fine.
There is no need for QinQ, what the QinQ option does is it adds top tag to one particularly tag. So switchport vlan mapping 1042 dot1q-tunnel 42
would map incoming [1042] stack to [42 1042] stack.
As opposed to switchport vlan mapping 1042 42
which maps incoming dot1q Vlan [1042] to dot1q Vlan [42].
JNPR M320 config:
{master}[edit interfaces ge-0/1/0 unit 1042]
user@m320# show
vlan-id 1042;
family inet {
address 10.42.42.1/24;
}
{master}[edit interfaces ge-0/1/0 unit 1042]
user@m320# run show interfaces ge-0/1/0
Physical interface: ge-0/1/0, Enabled, Physical link is Up
Interface index: 135, SNMP ifIndex: 506
Description: B: SUP32 ge5/1
Link-level type: Flexible-Ethernet, MTU: 9192, Speed: 1000mbps, BPDU Error: None,
MAC-REWRITE Error: None, Loopback: Disabled, Source filtering: Disabled, Flow control: Disabled,
Auto-negotiation: Enabled, Remote fault: Online
Device flags : Present Running
Interface flags: SNMP-Traps Internal: 0x4000
CoS queues : 8 supported, 8 maximum usable queues
Current address: 00:12:1e:d5:90:7f, Hardware address: 00:12:1e:d5:90:7f
Last flapped : 2013-02-19 09:14:29 UTC (19w6d 21:12 ago)
Input rate : 4560 bps (5 pps)
Output rate : 6968 bps (4 pps)
Active alarms : None
Active defects : None
Interface transmit statistics: Disabled
SUP32 config:
SUP32#show run int giga5/1
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 365 bytes
!
interface GigabitEthernet5/1
description F: M320 ge-0/1/0
switchport
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
switchport nonegotiate
switchport vlan mapping enable
switchport vlan mapping 1042 42
mtu 9216
bandwidth 1000000
speed nonegotiate
no cdp enable
spanning-tree portfast edge trunk
spanning-tree bpdufilter enable
end
SUP32#show ru int vlan42
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 61 bytes
!
interface Vlan42
ip address 10.42.42.2 255.255.255.0
end
SUP32#sh int GigabitEthernet5/1 vlan mapping
State: enabled
Original VLAN Translated VLAN
------------- ---------------
1042 42
SUP32#sh int vlan42
Vlan42 is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is EtherSVI, address is 0005.ddee.6000 (bia 0005.ddee.6000)
Internet address is 10.42.42.2/24
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1000000 Kbit, DLY 10 usec,
reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
Keepalive not supported
ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00
Last input 00:00:09, output 00:01:27, output hang never
Last clearing of "show interface" counters never
Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0
Queueing strategy: fifo
Output queue: 0/40 (size/max)
5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
L2 Switched: ucast: 17 pkt, 1920 bytes - mcast: 0 pkt, 0 bytes
L3 in Switched: ucast: 0 pkt, 0 bytes - mcast: 0 pkt, 0 bytes mcast
L3 out Switched: ucast: 0 pkt, 0 bytes mcast: 0 pkt, 0 bytes
38 packets input, 3432 bytes, 0 no buffer
Received 21 broadcasts (0 IP multicasts)
0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored
26 packets output, 2420 bytes, 0 underruns
0 output errors, 0 interface resets
0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
And
SUP32#ping 10.42.42.1
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.42.42.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/1/1 ms
SUP32#sh arp | i 10.42.42.1
Internet 10.42.42.1 12 0012.1ed5.907f ARPA Vlan42
SUP32#show mac address-table dynamic address 0012.1ed5.907f
Legend: * - primary entry
age - seconds since last seen
n/a - not available
vlan mac address type learn age ports
------+----------------+--------+-----+----------+--------------------------
Active Supervisor:
* 450 0012.1ed5.907f dynamic Yes 0 Gi5/1
* 50 0012.1ed5.907f dynamic Yes 0 Gi5/1
* 40 0012.1ed5.907f dynamic Yes 0 Gi5/1
* 42 0012.1ed5.907f dynamic Yes 5 Gi5/1
user@m320# run ping 10.42.42.2 count 2
PING 10.42.42.2 (10.42.42.2): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 10.42.42.2: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=0.495 ms
64 bytes from 10.42.42.2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=0.651 ms
--- 10.42.42.2 ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.495/0.573/0.651/0.078 ms
{master}[edit interfaces ge-0/1/0 unit 1042]
user@m320# run show arp no-resolve |match 10.42.42.2
00:05:dd:ee:60:00 10.42.42.2 ge-0/1/0.1042 none
I know the second one is specific to net traffic, but other than that is there any difference between the two?
No.
jhead@R1# set firewall ?
Possible completions:
> filter Define an IPv4 firewall filter
Contains IPv4 (protocol family inet).
jhead@R1# set firewall family ?
Possible completions:
> inet Protocol family IPv4 for firewall filter
Also contains IPv4 (protocol family inet).
If not, why have two different ways to write firewall rules on MX routers?
Older version of JUNOS used to only have "set firewall filter"
, and the newer versions contain "set firewall family"
as well. So it was decided that it should stay for those who don't need to specify a family other than IPv4 (inet).
It does seem a bit backwards, but if you're not already, I would advise sticking to one style just to keep configuration as clear as possible.
Best Answer
This is general design question which all network designers may have. i will explain it very simply.
if you want to apply security filtering profiles for inter VLAN routing, its good to have a trunk between core switch and router. And do the routing on firewall.
If you are provides internet connectivity through firewall and you needs to filter all traffic in common manner for all VLANs, you can use different VLAN between core switch and firewall. then add default route to firewall and apply internet traffic filtering at firewall.
this two methods are depends on your requirement.