We have 2 Juniper EX 3300 switches operating in a stack. It is running Junos 12.3R3.4. The switches have 4 SFP/SFP+ Ports. On FPC 1, PIC 1, Xcvr 0 you see a description of "SFP-FC8G-SW." However, the transceiver is a Juniper branded 10GE SFP+ SR (see image below).
The interface is up/down. On the client side the physical media indicates that it is connected but there seems to be no link layer connectivity. No traffic passes on the interface.
Here is the output of "show chassis hardware"
root@juniper> show chassis hardware
Hardware inventory:
Item Version Part number Serial number Description
Chassis GA021XXXXXXX Virtual Chassis
Routing Engine 0 REV 10 750-034247 GA021XXXXXXX EX3300 48-Port
Routing Engine 1 REV 10 750-034247 GA021XXXXXXX EX3300 48-Port
FPC 0 REV 10 750-034247 GA021XXXXXXX EX3300 48-Port
CPU BUILTIN BUILTIN FPC CPU
PIC 0 BUILTIN BUILTIN 48x 10/100/1000 Base-T
PIC 1 REV 10 750-034247 GA021XXXXXXX 4x GE/XE SFP+
Xcvr 0 NON-JNPR TED1728B11R SFP+-10G-CU3M
Xcvr 1 REV 01 740-021308 ALE0GT1 SFP+-10G-SR
Xcvr 2 ! NON-JNPR PRO3M110 SFP+-10G-CU1M
Xcvr 3 ! NON-JNPR PRO3M102 SFP+-10G-CU1M
Power Supply 0 PS 100W AC
Fan Tray Fan Tray
FPC 1 REV 10 750-034247 GA021XXXXXXX EX3300 48-Port
CPU BUILTIN BUILTIN FPC CPU
PIC 0 BUILTIN BUILTIN 48x 10/100/1000 Base-T
PIC 1 REV 10 750-034247 GA021XXXXXXX 4x GE/XE SFP+
Xcvr 0 NON-JNPR PNN32WL SFP-FC8G-SW
Xcvr 1 NON-JNPR TED1729BEKS SFP+-10G-CU3M
Xcvr 2 ! NON-JNPR PRO3M103 SFP+-10G-CU1M
Xcvr 3 ! NON-JNPR PRO3M111 SFP+-10G-CU1M
Power Supply 0 PS 100W AC
Fan Tray Fan Tray
Best Answer
Quick test: Swap the SFPs with a known working ones on the switch (if possible) and see if the condition stays with the ports or follow the SFPs.
If the other SFP works in the current "problematic SFP ports" there is less possibility of this being the switch's problem (I still could be, but just unlikely).
You can try to plug it in the other switch's too... if it's problematic there, it's almost guaranteed to be the SFP, unless you got the One-In-A-Million chance of having two switches with exactly the same freaking bug - extremely unlikely
If after all that JTAC still insist for RMA on both switches, just escalate the issue to get someone more reasonable at their end.
Edit: I've just seen that it was a mislabeling issue, you might want to mark this question as answered. :)