Can Fiber optic cables be too short? (dBm too high?)

fibernetworking

I have a few switches that are in the same rack that must be connected via fiber OM2, 50/125 MM, LC/LC (2 additional examples added for reference are 10GbE and are OM3).

A Verizon tech told me that he had to add attenuators because the laser was too strong and would burn out the optics.

I've never heard of it, are there any best practices on these db levels?

Output on the Juniper

>show interfaces diagnostics optics ge-0/2/1
Physical interface: ge-0/2/1
    Laser bias current                        :  5.284 mA
    Laser output power                        :  0.3120 mW / -5.06 dBm
    Module temperature                        :  35 degrees C / 95 degrees F
    Module voltage                            :  3.2670 V
    Receiver signal average optical power     :  0.2986 mW / -5.25 dBm
    Laser bias current high alarm threshold   :  13.000 mA
    Laser bias current low alarm threshold    :  1.000 mA
    Laser bias current high warning threshold :  12.500 mA
    Laser bias current low warning threshold  :  2.000 mA
    Laser output power high alarm threshold   :  1.0000 mW / 0.00 dBm
    Laser output power low alarm threshold    :  0.0440 mW / -13.57 dBm
    Laser output power high warning threshold :  0.5010 mW / -3.00 dBm
    Laser output power low warning threshold  :  0.1120 mW / -9.51 dBm
    Module temperature high alarm threshold   :  110 degrees C / 230 degrees F
    Module temperature low alarm threshold    :  -40 degrees C / -40 degrees F
    Module temperature high warning threshold :  93 degrees C / 199 degrees F
    Module temperature low warning threshold  :  -30 degrees C / -22 degrees F
    Module voltage high alarm threshold       :  3.600 V
    Module voltage low alarm threshold        :  3.000 V
    Module voltage high warning threshold     :  3.500 V
    Module voltage low warning threshold      :  3.100 V
    Laser rx power high alarm threshold       :  1.1220 mW / 0.50 dBm
    Laser rx power low alarm threshold        :  0.0079 mW / -21.02 dBm
    Laser rx power high warning threshold     :  0.7943 mW / -1.00 dBm
    Laser rx power low warning threshold      :  0.0200 mW / -16.99 dBm

Output on my Core Switch

CoreSwitch#sh interfaces tengigabitethernet 0/46
TenGigabitEthernet 0/46 is up, line protocol is up
Port is part of Port-channel 127
Description: Juniper
Hardware is DellEth, address is 00:00:00:00:00:00
    Current address is 00:00:00:00:00:00
Pluggable media present, SFP type is 1000BASE-SX
    Wavelength is 850nm
    SFP receive power reading is -5.8704dBm

CoreSwitch#sh int te0/7
TenGigabitEthernet 0/7 is up, line protocol is up
Port is part of Port-channel 7
Description: Access Switch Stack 1
Hardware is DellEth, address is 00:00:00:00:00:00
    Current address is 00:00:00:00:00:00
Pluggable media present, SFP+ type is 10GBASE-SR
    Medium is MultiRate, Wavelength is 850nm
    SFP+ receive power reading is -8.9177dBm

CoreSwitch#show int te0/6
TenGigabitEthernet 0/6 is up, line protocol is up
Port is part of Port-channel 6
Description: Access Switch Stack 2
Hardware is DellEth, address is 00:00:00:00:00:00
    Current address is 00:00:00:00:00:00
Non-qualified pluggable media present, SFP+ type is 10GBASE-SR
    Medium rate is unknown, Wavelength is 850nm
SFP+ receive power reading is -3.0356dBm

Is -5 dBm acceptable? The default 'ALARMs' are between -1 and -16, but should I aim for -10 dBm and spend the money on 5db attenuators?

Best Answer

I found my answer from a link in the network engineering group,

Damage by Overpowered Transmitters?

  • Well, yes and no.
  • Actually, most optics transmit at roughly the same power.
  • The typical outputs of 10km and 80km optics are within 3dB.
  • Long reach optics achieve their distances by having more sensitive receivers, not by having stronger transmitters.
  • 80km optics may have a 10dB+ more sensitive receiver than 10km
  • These sensitive receivers are what are in danger of burning out.
  • There are two thresholds you need to be concerned with.
  • Saturation point (where the receiver is “blinded”, and takes errors).
  • Damage point (where the receiver is actually damaged).
  • The actual values depend on the specific optic.
  • But generally speaking, only 80km+ optics are at risk.

enter image description here

Source Page 77-78 from Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Optical Networking – But Were Afraid to Ask

Because a short link will have effectively 0dB of attenuation, within the context of the question, the way to interpret the above chart is that the TX power (shown as a range of dBm values) should not include the receiver blindness nor receiver damage threshold. We can see this condition is satisfied only for LR, and not for ER or ZR. Thus, for a short link (e.g. inter-rack, as in the question, or really anything less than a few kilometers), attenuators are likely needed for ER (blindness threshold) and ZR (both blindness and damage threshold), but not for LR equipment.

Related Topic