Centos – ISO2USB vs Universal USB Installer vs LinuxLive USB Creator for a CentOS 5.9 install

centoscentos5installationusb-flash-drive

Is there any functional difference among these three tools, if I want to create a CentOS 5.9 bootable USB installer using a Windows box? I realize ISO2USB was more CentOS-specific, but also that general-purpose Linux tools have come a long way and have a larger following, although not necessarily of CentOS users.

ISO2USB forces you to use FAT32, which it then cannot copy DVD ISOs onto because they are larger than the largest allowed filesize.

UUI doesn't let you select the file because it's looking for something with LiveCD in the name.

I guess that leaves LLUC, which doesn't appear to have an option to point to a second DVD ISO, so I'm not sure if/how this is going to work.

Best Answer

Personally, I prefer UNetbootin. I've used it for CentOS, Ubuntu and Clonezilla and it's never given me any issues.